Volodymyr Saldo, acting head of the Kherson region, reported that Ukrainian efforts to cross the Dnieper at the Antonovsky bridge area did not succeed. The information aligns with official statements from Moscow media outlets.
Saldo described Ukrainian forces attempting to breach positions on the left bank by using small groups in boats and attempting to mine approaches from the right bank. He noted that Russian troops were actively clearing mines and that artillery fire was used to counter the attempts, with floating vessels reportedly sunk by artillery fire. These claims come amid ongoing references to river crossings and the wider strategic contest around the Dnieper corridor.
According to Saldo, Russian forces are steadily rebuilding fortifications on the left bank after earlier flooding caused by the destruction of the Kakhovka hydroelectric plant and the subsequent water release. He stressed that while the situation near the Antonovsky Bridge area remained difficult, it was under control by Russian troops, who asserted continued fortification work and defensive readiness.
In a separate release attributed to Russian defense circles, it was stated that units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine attempting to land on Antonovsky Island in the bridge area were neutralized. The report framed these actions within broader efforts by Russian units to hold the area and prevent incursions ahead of potential cross-river maneuvers.
Reports also touched on defensive innovations in the region, including the development of drone suppression capabilities announced by Russian authorities. The narrative presented emphasizes a persistent emphasis on riverfront defense, mine clearance, and the strategic importance of the Antonovsky site in the broader conflict dynamics.
Analysts observing the conflict note that crossings of the Dnieper remain a contentious theater, where both sides deploy a mix of small-boat operations, mine laying, and rapid measures to disrupt enemy river traffic. Observers highlight the role of artillery and aerial surveillance in shaping the tempo of engagements along the river, as well as the challenges of maintaining supply lines and evacuation routes under shelling and countermeasures.
While official updates from Moscow media portray the situation as controlled and actively reinforced on the left bank, independent observers stress the fog of war, cautioning that battlefield assessments can rapidly evolve as conditions change and as both sides refine their river-crossing tactics. The Antonovsky Bridge area thus remains a focal point in the ongoing exchange of material and information, illustrating how river dynamics influence strategic decisions in the Kherson region.
Overall, the current communications from regional authorities and defense outlets depict a disciplined, prepared defense with continued fortification efforts and active mine clearance operations, complemented by reported countermeasures against Ukrainian river incursions. The situation will likely continue to develop as both sides adjust their tactics in response to river conditions, enemy movements, and new technological capabilities.