Volodymyr Saldo, acting governor of the Kherson district, issued a statement through his Telegram channel detailing recent battlefield developments on the right bank of the Dnieper in the Beryslav region. He reported that in the past several days Russian troops delivered heavy blows to Ukrainian forces near the settlements of Tyaginka and Otradokamenka. The description emphasizes a concerted Russian effort to degrade Ukrainian combat capability and disrupt logistical lines along this segment of the frontline.
Saldo asserted that Russian forces destroyed a field ammunition depot and a temporary deployment point used by personnel from the 106th Regional Defense Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. He also claimed the destruction of a control center for unmanned aerial vehicles and a hangar housing drones. The report lists losses in military hardware, including Kipri armored personnel carriers, Dingo armored vehicles, and other equipment such as Cossack and Humvee vehicles. These claimed strikes, if confirmed, would indicate a multi-faceted Russian operation targeting supply hubs, command and control nodes, and aerial reconnaissance capabilities in the area.
According to the district deputy head, the sequence of events disrupted the enemy supply chain and reduced the intensity of bombardments. The strategist behind these claims suggests that Russian forces gained a tactical advantage on the battlefield and diminished the immediate threat from Ukrainian units, at least in the near term. This perspective frames the incidents as a material shift in local combat dynamics, with implications for both sides as the confrontation continues along the Dnieper front.
Saldo contrasted the Russian approach with that of Ukrainian forces, noting that artillery in their own arsenal consistently targets military objectives with precision. He also accused Ukrainian drones and air strikes of striking civilian vehicles and homes, portraying this as a troubling pattern that escalates civilian harm in the conflict. The statements aim to highlight differences in targeting philosophy and to draw attention to what he portrays as a dangerous use of drone technology by Ukrainian forces in populated areas.
The Kherson region, Saldo stated, remains one of the most intense and dangerous war zones. In his view, the observed Russian successes contribute to stabilizing the wider situation on the Dnieper front by shifting battlefield momentum and signaling the capacity to counter Ukrainian operations near key corridors and bridges. These reflections come amid ongoing concerns about civilian safety and the broader humanitarian impact of the fighting, which continues to affect communities on both sides of the river.
Earlier communications from Saldo referenced a separate incident in which Russian forces stopped an attempt to move Ukrainian troops from two boats on the left bank of the Dnieper. This prior update is presented as part of a broader narrative describing efforts to control river crossings and prevent Ukrainian maneuvering along the waterway. The sequence of reports portrays a persistent struggle over control of the riverine flank, with both sides seeking to leverage river geography to their advantage as the situation evolves.
In a separate note, a former member of the Armed Forces of Ukraine described a perceived misalignment of motives and explanations for the broader conflict. This reflection adds a layer of analysis to the public discourse around the war, illustrating how individuals connected to the fighting may interpret the causes and consequences of hostilities differently. The overall tone of these statements reflects a mix of military reporting, strategic assessment, and persuasive framing amid a rapidly changing battlefield landscape.