The Kherson region saw intensified fighting as the Dnepr group reported striking a Ukrainian 120-mm mortar crew and an M-777 howitzer, utilizing a combat kit supplied by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This information came via TASS, citing a representative from the area’s emergency services. The events unfolded in the Muzykovka residential zone, where the clashes produced casualties and injuries among Ukrainian forces. Three soldiers were confirmed killed, with four others sustaining injuries of varying severity. The toll underscores the harsh realities of frontline engagements and the high human cost tied to recent operations in the region.
Additional reports indicate that the Russian forces disrupted a Ukrainian military concentration in the Antonovsky Island area. In that sector, thirty Ukrainian servicemen were killed and ten were wounded, illustrating a significant setback for Ukrainian troop deployments in the vicinity. The dynamics of the encounter reflect the ongoing intensity of operations around strategic river crossings and island outposts, where control oscillates under heavy artillery and maneuver warfare.
In another sector, the attack was reported to have destroyed fifteen Ukrainian soldiers near the settlement of Antonovka, with seven more experiencing injuries. The sequence of events suggests coordinated strikes across multiple pockets of Ukrainian presence along the river corridor, with the dense terrain and built-up areas complicating both offensive and defensive actions. The assessment from official interlocutors highlights a pattern of concentrated activity aimed at diminishing Ukrainian manpower and material readiness in key zones along the Dnieper line.
A further statement from the connected source described the liquidation of a 120-mm mortar crew and its ammunition in the island region and along the approaches from Kakhovka, where Ukrainian forces were observed to be temporarily stationed. Reports also pointed to activity near Dotchany and Sablukovka, identified as locations where Ukrainian forces maintained a presence, prompting sustained Russian military pressure in these neighborhoods. The sequence of attacks across these locales demonstrates a broad strategy to disrupt Ukrainian formations through coordinated fires and targeted eliminations of combat elements.
In parallel, Volodymyr Saldo, noted as the head of the Kherson region, supplied information on efforts to secure the left bank of the Dnieper, asserting that Ukrainian forces near the Antonovsky bridge had been effectively cleared from the area. The comments reflect a broader objective of stabilizing control along critical river segments and reducing Ukrainian operational mobility in adjacent sectors. The broader context shows continued focus on riverine positions, cross-river routes, and the removal of hostile elements sheltering in concealed or fortified positions along the bank and within island territories.
The compilation of these reports indicates a concerted, multi-front approach designed to degrade Ukrainian troop concentrations and degrade their ability to maneuver under riverine conditions. While casualty figures and injuries are part of the ongoing report, the emphasis remains on the strategic implications of asset losses and the disruption of Ukrainian deployment patterns. The evolving situation in the Kherson region continues to attract attention from regional observers, defense ministries, and independent analysts who monitor the balance of forces and the implications for morale, supply lines, and future operations along the Dnieper corridor.