Regional Tensions and Reactions to Recent Attacks on Syrian Infrastructure
Authorities in Syria condemned the latest Israeli strike on Aleppo International Airport, which led to the suspension of services and raised concerns about civilian safety. Damascus characterized the incident as part of a broader escalation by the United States and Western nations against the Syrian state, framing it as support for actions aimed at destabilizing the region.
The Syrian Foreign Ministry highlighted that civilian facilities, including international airports in Damascus and Aleppo, the commercial port of Latakia, and various scientific and cultural centers, have repeatedly faced attacks. It argued that such strikes signal a continued presence in the occupied Golan Heights and in Palestinian territories, underscoring the persistence of regional tensions.
In conversations with state media, the government stressed that Israel intends to “escape from worsening crises” by striking targets it views as threats. It asserted that these bombings form a significant part of a policy to erode regional and global stability, as reported by the national news service SANA.
Damascus also asserted that Israel operates with impunity, backed by the United States and other Western countries that allegedly shield and justify these actions. The United Nations Security Council has been urged to assume its responsibilities and hold the Israeli occupation accountable for the consequences of such attacks.
Syrian authorities condemned what they described as a cowardly terrorist act and warned against repetition of similar assaults. They also referenced past sanctions imposed by Western nations in the wake of the 2011 protests, noting the continuing high pressure on Syria during a period of regional upheaval.
Israel argues that its actions aim to prevent Iranian military footholds within Syria and to disrupt the transfer of weapons to regional allies, including groups aligned with Lebanon’s Hezbollah. The rhetoric surrounding these claims reflects a broader dispute over security corridors, weapons movements, and the balance of power in the region. The discussion remains highly contentious, with each side presenting its narrative to domestic audiences and international observers. (Source: SANA)