Rural Fund: 60,932 Euro. Isabel, a case that intertwines trust, guardianship, and family conflict, is laid bare through documents seized by the Civil Guards during a search at a Madrid residence. The material shows that Isabel’s assets were monitored from her arrival in the city, sparking questions about control by her nephew and his wife. The evidence, collected by defense attorneys and presented to the judge, points to a movement of money and property that coincided with a sudden change in the victim’s circumstances. A careful review notes a revised will that increasingly favored Arancha, including a substantial cash sum and a Grado council property. This summary is drawn from investigative reporting conducted by Prensa Ibérica.
The cited notebook, found among belongings in the couple’s home in Rivas, corroborates the claim that Isabel’s assets were under strict supervision from the outset of her Madrid stay. The documents, part of the formal record in this case, imply a deliberate pattern aimed at consolidating control over the elder woman’s finances. The correspondingly described life of the victim reflects a shift in her financial and residential status just before her death, including a notable legatee change and the disposition of assets. The narrative above aligns with the evidence summarized for the court by the defense team, as reported by Prensa Ibérica.
Cadmium and manganese
Pathology reports and toxicology tests on the elderly woman revealed elevated levels of cadmium and manganese in her bloodstream. The concentrations were markedly higher than typical background levels. Debates about the manner of death centered on whether it was accidental or intentional, with the coroner concluding that the substances had been ingested. The timing places these findings shortly before Isabel died in late June. The report leaned toward a homicide interpretation, signaling intentional poisoning rather than natural causes, according to the official review and subsequent coverage by Prensa Ibérica.
Earlier in the year, Isabel’s brother, living in Asturias, reported that she had vanished after a visit from Luis Lorenzo and his wife. The couple allegedly removed her from her home and kept her in their Madrid residence, which raised alarms about coercive control and the ability to contact her family. The brother warned that the couple would not allow conversations with Isabel and were focused on her assets. The family’s statements describe fear that the relatives were using Isabel for financial gain, a point echoed in the case files discussed in Madrid’s judicial proceedings with attribution to Prensa Ibérica.
“They’re taking my cabin”
Isabel’s relatives recount house visits during which she expressed reluctance about Madrid life and discomfort with Arancha and her husband. She reportedly said she did not want to go to Madrid and voiced strained feelings toward the actor and his nephew. The family notes that the couple appeared to restrict the elder woman’s movements and social contacts, a pattern described by those around Isabel as preventing her brothers from arranging care in Asturias. A caregiver who looked after Isabel the month before her death recalled her unhappiness and a desire for independence; Isabel reportedly wanted peace and freedom from what she perceived as controlling behavior.
The broader account suggests the couple wanted to keep Isabel closer to them so family members would not place her in a residence in Asturias. A caregiver familiar with the situation described Isabel as unhappy with the arrangements and expressed a longing to live without heavy supervision. The portrait of Isabel’s final days reflects a woman who valued autonomy and expressed distress about the sense of being managed by others, according to testimony cited in the case files with attribution to Prensa Ibérica.
The narrative also notes that Isabel, in good health prior to the Madrid stay, resisted interactions that seemed designed to isolate her from relatives. The accounts indicate she had positive moments with relatives and friends, despite the unsettling changes in her living situation.
Counter diagnoses
The case history includes multiple hospital visits across Madrid between March and June of the previous year, detailing a rapid decline in cognitive function after Isabel moved into her nephew’s home. Different medical professionals offered contrasting opinions on her mental health between regions, with Madrid health workers suggesting significant cognitive deterioration while doctors in Asturias did not observe a diagnosed mental illness. The record notes a sequence of notarial visits during this period that aligned with Arancha’s plans for handling her aunt’s money, as summarized in official materials and reported by Prensa Ibérica.
A consistent thread in the documentation is the tension between health assessments made in Asturias and those issued in Madrid, highlighting how assessments influenced perceptions of Isabel’s capacity and the implications for her asset management. The material indicates a pattern of regular medical consultations alongside questions about whether the health evaluations supported or undermined the guardianship arrangements, as described in the case summary attributed to Prensa Ibérica.
Social bonuses and hidden money
The couple reportedly held a substantial amount of cash at their residence in Rivas, contradicting the last known income timelines from 2015 and 2016. Reports show they sought social assistance for electricity and other fundamental costs, while one party reportedly ceased pension payments to a child and explored additional aid programs. The documents describe a broader pattern of financial activity tied to the aunt’s estate, raising questions about the legitimacy of these transfers and the possible prioritization of personal wealth. These details come from the investigative summaries published by Prensa Ibérica.
Death insurance
The narrative notes a transfer of roughly 22,953 euros linked to Isabel’s savings, purportedly to cover care expenses. However, the summaries flag potential irregularities in capital movements surpassing typical costs for caregiving, inviting scrutiny of the financial logic behind the payments. Investigators uncovered a 24 day window before Isabel’s death during which Arancha obtained a life insurance policy intended to finance the transport and burial in Asturias. The actress and her partner later expressed regret about the arrangement. After detention, Arancha reportedly expressed distress to authorities, indicating a possible change in intent and a desire to prevent exposure of the events. The reporting from Prensa Ibérica frames these actions within the broader interrogation of financial management surrounding Isabel’s estate.