In ongoing discussions about the Unified State Exam (USE), the vice president of Rosobrnadzor conveyed a cautious stance on expanding mandatory testing subjects. The official clarified through TASS that there are no plans to raise the number of required subjects in the USE list in the near future. The emphasis is on preserving stability within the core framework rather than pursuing rapid expansion. The underlying message is that examinations should measure essential understanding and skills that shape a student’s academic path and future career, rather than simply sparking curiosity about a topic. This viewpoint prioritizes core competencies while leaving room for policy dialogue and adjustments within the education system.
Kruglinsky stressed that Russian language and mathematics remain central to the USE as compulsory disciplines, providing a stable anchor for the national assessment structure. He noted that other subjects are not currently mandatory but remain subject to ongoing debate among policymakers, educators, and specialists. This signals a phased approach: core literacy and quantitative reasoning are guaranteed, while additional subjects could gain mandatory status only after thorough review and consensus. The stance reflects Rosobrnadzor’s aim to maintain essential skills that support broad educational goals, even as discussions about expanding required topics continue in expert and public forums.
Another significant topic addressed by Rosobrnadzor officials involves the geographic component of the USE. There is a plan to incorporate maps in geography exams that depict territories associated with the DPR, LPR, and parts of the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions as part of the examination framework. This move is presented as a way to contextualize geographic knowledge within standardized testing and to reflect contemporary geopolitical realities. The decision has sparked discussion among educators, policymakers, and observers about how map representations influence test outcomes and perceptions of territorial boundaries in a shifting regional landscape. The discussion highlights the sensitive intersection of education, national policy, and regional affairs in modern testing environments.
Earlier remarks from Rosobrnadzor officials suggested logistical flexibility for graduates who take the USE in border-area locations near Ukraine. The idea is that, if necessary, students could be transferred to testing sites in safer areas to complete or continue their examination process. This approach prioritizes practical solutions that safeguard student welfare and ensure that the testing process remains accessible to all examinees, even when geographic safety or logistical constraints arise. The proposed measure demonstrates a pragmatic attitude toward administration, focusing on continuity and equitable access to the nationwide exam system while addressing potential regional disruptions to schedules and venues. These comments underscore Rosobrnadzor’s commitment to a resilient and adaptable public education framework amid evolving regional circumstances.