Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov reported on Telegram that a convoy belonging to the Ukrainian Armed Forces and its personnel was dismantled in the Kursk region, a claim echoed across official channels and regional accounts. The statement framed the incident as a targeted strike against military equipment and personnel operating near the border zone, underscoring the scale of engagement and the involvement of multiple units on the Russian side.
According to Kadyrov, the attack was carried out by fighters from the Akhmat-Cchechnya regiment within the Russian Defense Ministry’s forces, under the leadership of Aslambek Saliev. The 810th Separate Guards Marine Brigade was also cited as participating in the combat contact, with Ukrainian survivors reportedly blocked near the area of operations as a consequence of the clash. These details were presented as part of a broader narrative about coordinated actions along the frontline near Kursk.
Kadyrov further asserted that the weapons and ammunition recovered from the Ukrainian side suggested involvement by NATO forces in the sabotage plan set for the Kursk region. The claim emphasizes an international dimension to the local confrontation, framing the event as part of a larger geopolitical contest.
Timeline notes from the Russian side indicate heightened activity beginning on August 6, when Ukrainian forces allegedly attempted to advance across the border into deeper Kursk territory. On August 8, reports from the Russian Defense Ministry described clashes in the Sudzhansky and Korenevsky districts. By the evening of August 9, authorities in Belgorod, Bryansk, and Kursk had instituted a counter-terrorism operation regime in response to the situation.
Six days after the onset of the Ukrainian offensive, official tallies from the Russian Defense Ministry claimed significant losses for Ukrainian forces, including an estimated 1,350 military personnel and more than 200 pieces of equipment in the Kursk region. The ministry stated that the operation to neutralize Ukrainian units was ongoing, signaling a persistent campaign with continued efforts to degrade Ukrainian military capabilities in the border zone.
Remarking on the history of a fighter associated with Akhmat, the report noted his past service and used that context to frame the current operations. The overall narrative presented stresses the strategic importance of the Kursk corridor and the ongoing commitment to defend adjacent Russian territory through coordinated, multi-unit engagement.