In Murcia, an incident surrounding a concert by artist Rocío Saiz sparked questions about police conduct and the handling of public events. Official sources indicated that an inspector was assigned to review the case at the local headquarters, and the police department reported that a formal lawsuit had been filed, suggesting the actions taken needed clarification through an internal investigation.
The investigation process continues with the inspector actively involved while the file progresses. The protocol followed involves assigning an instructor to review and oversee the case once the headquarters has examined the initial materials.
Officials stressed the sensitivity of the matter and reaffirmed their commitment to respecting the rights of the LGTBI+ community, emphasizing that the investigation aims to ensure rights are not disturbed and that all procedures are properly followed.
The emotional weight of the incident was echoed by statements from the public sphere. A prominent social media post from June 25, 2023, by Rocío Saiz described a moment when she felt overwhelmed by the encounter with police officers and conveyed deep personal distress about events from eight years prior. This message, quoted by the artist on a social platform, highlighted the impact of perceived hostility and the lasting emotional toll of such experiences. The post has been widely referenced in discussions about the incident and its broader social implications.
The singer later addressed followers on networks, describing a police officer’s gaze as hateful and suggesting that the stress of that moment contributed to ongoing anxiety after the incident.
political reactions
Rebeca Pérez, deputy mayor of Murcia, commented on the incident, noting that the City Council has a history of cooperating with event organizers and that operations were conducted with efficiency and in alignment with records and procedures. Regarding the actions of the local police officer who halted the concert, Pérez framed it as a personal decision under investigation and denied any political motive behind it.
The Socialist Party and its representatives also weighed in on the situation. Miguel Company stated that the suspension of the concert for the artist removing her shirt during a Pride event in Murcia was unacceptable and called for accountability from the mayor. Company added that the public deserved clarity about whether any orders or directives from the City Council were involved and who issued them.
A representative from PSRM-PSOE urged transparency, arguing that it would be cowardly to avoid addressing the matter openly and that citizens are entitled to know the origin of any instructions given to the local police.
Beyond immediate political responses, another prominent voice reminded the public that influence is not measured solely by follower counts, podcasts, or awards. The sentiment underscored the complexity of balancing artistic expression, public safety, and community standards in a democratic city. The discussion reflected a broader debate about rights, visibility, and accountability in public performances.
On the legal side, authorities clarified that no municipal ordinances had been violated according to their assessment. The characterization of the event suggested there was no legal basis to prohibit shirtless appearances within Murcia, and that the decision to halt the performance appeared unjustified and disproportionate in the context described. Commentators stressed that the incident involved a moment of personal expression by the artist, Rocío Saiz, and should be understood in light of freedoms of expression alongside public safety considerations.