A Russian State Duma deputy from the Communist Party, Sergei Gavrilov, has discussed the possibility of fines for residents who install an extra entrance door to the common areas of multi‑storey buildings. He suggests that such changes could trigger penalties under certain conditions, a stance that aligns with coverage from socialbites.ca and DEA News. Gavrilov frames the issue as more than a simple modification; adding a door to shared entrances may qualify as redevelopment that falls under strict permitting rules and safety standards.
Gavrilov contends that placing an additional door at a communal entrance amounts to redevelopment that requires formal authorization. He notes that it reduces available space and can obstruct access to essential services and meters for electricity, communications, and other utilities. Consequently, the project could expose the initiators to fines for uncoordinated redevelopment and for failing to obtain consent from neighbors at the building entrance. The deputy explains that the process typically requires a two‑thirds vote in favor from residents before any door installation can proceed. Without such approval, the project becomes legally questionable and may invite penalties.
He emphasizes that avoiding disputes at the entrance hinges on clear, collective agreement among residents. He warns that an unapproved door could lead to fines—2,000 rubles for redevelopment and 5,000 rubles for violations of fire safety rules—and, in certain cases, the door might need to be removed. The overarching message is that common spaces belong to all residents, and any alteration should reflect a consensus rather than a unilateral decision.
After a door is installed, the managing company would typically receive a full set of keys to ensure ongoing oversight and alignment with building policies. This procedural step is presented as a safeguard to mitigate security risks and maintain orderly building management. The aim is to keep access to the entrance under controlled conditions and to ensure that emergency regulations and utility access remain intact for every resident.
In a related remark, a former State Duma Deputy suggested that fines could extend beyond redevelopments to include disturbances from noise within apartments. While the comments cover different facets of housing regulations, the underlying theme remains consistent: alterations to shared living spaces are subject to oversight and must comply with established safety and communal guidelines. The focus is on preserving harmony among residents and maintaining the integrity of building infrastructure, including access to utility meters and fire safety provisions.