American gynecologists Jen Gunther and Charis Chambers note that The Daily Mail’s suggestion about the possible synchronization of menstrual cycles among women who live together or who spend a lot of time in close contact lacks solid scientific support. The core issue, they explain, is whether there is a verifiable biological mechanism that could cause multiple cycles to align. In their view, the idea does not rest on credible physiological evidence, and its persistence in popular discourse often hinges on anecdotes rather than rigorous data.
Gunther argues that there is no known biological process that would reliably synchronize menstrual rhythms across individuals. Chambers adds that the idea gained traction largely due to early work by Harvard University psychologist Martha McClintock, who observed correlation in cycles among roommates after extended cohabitation. Subsequent scrutiny and replication efforts have repeatedly failed to prove the claim, underscoring a consensus in the scientific community that the synchronization hypothesis is not supported by robust research. Critics emphasize that later studies failed to reproduce the effect and that observed coincidences could be explained by chance or by biases in how dates are reported and remembered.
While a number of women insist they have experienced synchronized cycles with friends or partners, experts point to cognitive biases as a likely explanation. Chambers notes that selective memory and confirmation bias play larger roles than any biological mechanism. People tend to remember moments when cycles align and overlook numerous instances when they do not, shaping a misleading impression of conformity. The phenomenon, therefore, appears more as a perceptual illusion than a reproducible biological event, even though personal anecdotes can feel compelling in the moment. This divergence between anecdote and evidence is a common tension in topics related to reproductive biology that draw strong cultural interest and personal relevance. The broader takeaway is that science currently does not support cycle synchronization as a real, predictable biological phenomenon, and health guidance should reflect that reality rather than popular myth.
Former nutritionist noteHow to eat on different days of the menstrual cycle?