The second Ídolo Awards again drew attention for who was not present. Yes, another year of discussions about invitations and absences. Recall that last season sparked controversy when Natalia Osona and several creators did not receive invitations to the first awards dedicated to online creators. This year unfolded in a similar way, with notable omissions and explanations that seemed to come from the individuals themselves. Among those who chose not to attend were Maria Pombo and her sister Marta, along with Rocío Osorno. What exactly happened this time around?
The Ídolo Awards generated plenty of talk due to the absence of several influential figures, with Maria Pombo at the center of the chatter. The previous winner of Idol of the Year said she could not attend due to other professional obligations, while Marta attributed her own absence to a disagreement with one of the contenders who had a history of provocative remarks toward them. Someone familiar with the situation suggested the rift centered on a large category at the event, and a personal dispute overshadowed the festivities.
One participant explained that a personal issue with a candidate in a major category led to the decision not to participate. The candidate had allegedly insulted Pombo and her siblings, labeling them with words that were interpreted as fascist. The accusation was described as serious by those close to Pombo, underscoring how personal confrontations can spill into high profile events and color public perception.
The conversation did not stop there. Other well-known figures, including Rocío Osorno, Teresa Bass, and Raquel Reitx, also opted out at the last moment. The reasons varied: Rocío cited a scheduling conflict, while Teresa Bass suggested a degree of disagreement with certain organizational choices. These last minute changes amplified the sense that the event had become a focal point for disputes within the community.
The awards scene mirrored past experiences at other major galas, where only a subset of nominees and a trusted ally of a leading influencer appeared on the official red carpet. Photographers and media teams later offered alternative opportunities for attendees to have their photos captured outside the main press frame, underscoring a recurring tension between official coverage and more independent portrayals of the event. Some attendees shared their perspectives on the handling of invitations and the visibility afforded to various participants through their own channels.
Estela Grandre, among others, weighed in on the invitation process via her social media platform. The topic of invitations became a talking point, inviting broader reflection on how these ceremonies balance inclusivity with public interest and media dynamics. In private circles and public forums, opinions varied about whether the event was inclusive enough or whether the organizers should adjust the criteria for future editions. The discourse extended into the press, where questions about access, representation, and the role of influencers in such ceremonies were raised.
Public commentary from key figures remained blunt. One widely followed personality responded to the ongoing discussion with a simple assessment: the situation was not favorable to the overall mood of the event. The exchange highlighted that the drama surrounding invitations often overshadows the achievements of those recognized at the awards. The broader takeaway is a reminder that talent and influence in this landscape are intertwined with public relationships, media narratives, and the evolving expectations of audiences across platforms.