By late April, the far-right candidate finished a close second in the presidential race, surpassing forty percent of the vote and posting one of the strongest showings in recent memory. The dramatic arc of Western European politics has been shifting: in France, the political circle surrounding Marine Le Pen began to retreat as the campaign season progressed. The National Rally (RN) found itself contending with a reshaped political landscape, while the parliamentary vote scheduled for June featured a two-round process that pitted Emmanuel Macron against a newly unified left led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon.
Recent polling suggested Le Pen’s party would rank as the third-largest in the first round, hovering near nineteen percent. Yet the two-round system, which awards seats to the top candidates in each of France’s 577 constituencies, means that only a fraction of seats could realistically be captured by the far right. Estimates ranged from about twenty to forty deputies in the second round, translating to as little as seven percent of seats at best. Some forecasts even warned the RN might fall short of the threshold to form a parliamentary group, which would require a minimum bloc of MPs.
Historically, the far right has found legislative success difficult under France’s electoral rules. The two-round arrangement tends to favor the so-called lesser evil, dampening a decisive breakthrough for the Le Pen camp. Only in 1986, when a more proportional approach briefly existed, did the National Front secure a meaningful number of seats in the Assembly. In most elections since then, RN representation remained modest, with just a handful of deputies in many terms.
Le Pen acknowledges defeat before the vote
Entering late April, Le Pen remained confident about strong results, having achieved a second-round tally of forty-two percent and carrying the most votes in many constituencies. The aim was to build a coherent caucus that could act as a primary opposition force. Yet Mélenchon’s rapid rise attracted significant media attention and helped forge a left-wide alliance—including Untamed France, the Socialist Party, the Greens, and the Communists—turning Mélenchon into Macron’s main challenger and diminishing RN’s momentum.
In a radio interview at the end of May, Le Pen framed the political arithmetic plainly: a Macron-led government would eventually form a cabinet, and that result would be dramatic but not necessarily transformative. The left’s newly consolidated effort raised questions about the RN’s capacity to translate appeals into legislative power, while Le Pen’s cautious rhetoric suggested a strategy focused on building a group in parliament rather than pursuing a sweeping majority. The broader shift indicated a careful, disciplined approach may be better aligned with the party’s practical strengths: maximizing its parliamentary foothold while avoiding overreach that could alienate core supporters.
Risk of abstention and organizational challenges
One of RN’s key vulnerabilities, noted by party strategists, was a potential abstention problem. The party’s mobilization chief warned that disengagement by the electorate could undermine efforts to push its agenda, while observers highlighted organizational hiccups that stood in the way of a robust ground game. The campaign grappled with chaotic event logistics and a public perception of disarray, as discussions about access, tickets, and security surfaced in media coverage.
Within leadership circles, discussions shifted to the future of the party’s leadership and its parliamentary prospects. The deputy leader of RN emphasized that the focus was not solely on a presidential bid but on securing a stable parliamentary presence for the next term. It remained clear that the ambition of a future administration would depend on building a durable base in the House, even as some figures suggested that party stalwarts should plan for ongoing representation rather than an immediate top-tier victory. The broader ultranationalist scene faced competition from rival voices and a political environment that rewarded steady, localized outreach as much as loud spectacle.
— An RN candidate facing legislative debates, amid questions about the future path for public service in France, reflects the ongoing tension between populist rhetoric and pragmatic governance. The 2022 political discourse left many observers with questions about how well the party would translate campaign energy into long-run influence.
Despite a reputation for overcoming setbacks, Le Pen’s movement displayed familiar shortcomings during this cycle, particularly in establishing a strong local footprint and presenting a candidate pool with verifiable governance experience. Social media scrutiny highlighted moments when candidates appeared unprepared or ill-equipped to handle debates, underscoring the need for a deeper bench and more disciplined messaging.
Amid a challenging electoral landscape, RN could still find some consolation if it secures its own parliamentary group—an essential financial and procedural boon for the party. A more limited outcome for rival right-wing figures, such as Eric Zemmour, who polled around seven percent in the presidential vote, would further define the competition on the ultranationalist side and shape the legislative arithmetic for years to come.