The press service of the Dnepr group released a detailed update on battlefield activity, highlighting recent claims about Russia’s actions against Ukrainian military positions. The report, attributed to the Dnepr communications channel and cited by DEA News, outlines a sequence of events tied to the destruction of Ukrainian military assets and disruption of logistics near the contested front lines. According to the briefing, Russian forces have targeted a variety of facilities and equipment belonging to the 124th Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, with a focus on disrupting ammunition storage and command-and-control capabilities. The claim emphasizes a series of strikes that reportedly left behind a reduced capacity for immediate military operations in the affected zones. Attribution to the Dnepr group’s press service is noted as the source of these specifics.
Officials reported that the Russian military claimed victories on multiple fronts, citing the neutralization of key assets in and around strategic districts including Antonovka, Zelenovka, Tyaginka, and the Nadnepryansky district. The assertion centers on the destruction of equipment and the impairment of systems that support Ukrainian combat readiness, with particular emphasis on the loss of mobility, firepower, and survivability for Ukrainian units operating in these corridors. The statement stresses that a range of assets were liquidated, including heavy mortars, a self-propelled artillery system recognized by observers as a variant of an Akatsiya platform, and a satellite communications setup that could hinder real-time battlefield coordination. An electronic warfare facility, identified as Bukovel-AD, is highlighted as a contributor to overall disruption on the ground, along with a depots and caches that previously stored weapons and munitions. The narrative frames these encounters as a broader push to degrade Ukrainian logistical capabilities near areas of active engagement.
The update also notes activity in the airspace and near civilian settlements, claiming that three drones were intercepted through electronic suppression measures near the communities of Obryvka, Krynki, and Vinogradovo. The account characterizes these interceptions as part of a wider effort to reduce aerial reconnaissance and strike precision, thereby limiting the Ukrainian side’s situational awareness and targeting accuracy in contested zones. The emphasis on electronic warfare underscores a strategic shift toward countering unmanned systems and communications channels that support frontline operations.
Earlier portions of the briefing referenced persistent artillery exchanges and continued operational tempo along the front, with assertions that Ukrainian artillery crews faced losses to specific self-propelled gun systems described by observers as Gvozdika and Acacia variants. The narrative ties these losses to tactical setbacks in the broader theater, suggesting that Ukrainian units have faced pressure from Russian-firepower superiority in certain sectors. The overall tone communicates a sense of momentum in offensive actions, while acknowledging the ongoing challenges faced by Ukrainian forces along the contact line in the Kherson direction. The report closes by reiterating that these assertions are part of a broader strategic narrative, inviting readers to consider the implications for future maneuvering and resource allocation on both sides of the conflict. Attribution for the reported details remains with the Dnepr group’s press service, with external verification noted as pending or unavailable at the time of publication.