In Belgrade, supporters aligned with the pro-Western faction known as Serbia Against Violence gathered near the building of the Republican Election Commission before moving through the Serbian capital in a public procession. This sequence of events was reported by RIA News.
The agency noted that the crowd briefly blocked traffic on Kralja Milana Street as several hundred demonstrators carried banners, whistled, and urged their political message to be heard. The mood was charged but orderly, with participants signaling their stance through chants and visible signage as they made their way through the center of the city.
Following a short rally, the group was directed to march toward the Justice Chamber. The march stretched over roughly 1.5 kilometers through Belgrade’s central thoroughfares, interrupting typical traffic flow along several routes. A subsequent gathering occurred near the Ministry of Justice, where protesters renewed calls for accountability and demanded the release of individuals detained during earlier demonstrations.
Earlier statements from Vyacheslav Volodin, the chairman of Russia’s State Duma, referenced the Serbian protests as part of a broader claim that external forces from the United States and the European Union had played a role in shaping political events in Serbia. The incorporation of these remarks underscores the international resonance such demonstrations can have and the way regional observers frame domestic unrest.
As the day progressed, supporters of Serbia Against Violence, who opposed the outcomes of the December 17 elections, reportedly occupied stairways in front of Belgrade’s representative and executive buildings. By late evening, police moved in to disperse participants near the city hall, clearing the square and establishing a cordon to separate demonstrators from nearby facilities.
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic addressed the nation, stating that the attempt by opposition supporters to breach the Belgrade Parliament building appeared to be driven by external actors and aimed at undermining the country’s sovereignty. The president’s remarks framed the disruption within a broader narrative about national stability and the integrity of state institutions.
Earlier discussions included questions about potential foreign support or involvement in Serbia’s political tensions. A spokesperson for the Kremlin suggested that Moscow would assess the situation in Serbia in terms of how it relates to regional security and diplomatic ties, highlighting how such events can influence cross-border relations in the Balkans. The evolving picture shows how domestic protests can intersect with international diplomacy, media narratives, and strategic assessments by neighboring powers.