A recent study by IC Rosgosstrakh and Otkritie, reviewed by socialbites.ca, highlights a clear trend: nearly half of Russians who wish to live outside urban centers aim to build a country house from the ground up. The research suggests that this ambition is especially prevalent among men aged 36 to 45, who represent the largest single group among these hopeful homeowners. The results point to a growing preference for self-built homes as a path to a more independent rural lifestyle, with many respondents viewing construction as a personal project that can become a long-term asset for their families.
On cost considerations, the survey reveals a strong belief that building a home could be more budget-friendly than purchasing an existing property. Nearly half of those polled think that a new build may reduce overall spend in the long run, especially when compared with the cumulative costs of renovations and upgrades required by an older dwelling. This perception reflects a practical approach to housing that favors long-term value and the ability to tailor a home to exact preferences from the outset.
When it comes to timelines, opinions vary widely. About a third of respondents estimate that the construction process will span roughly a year. A quarter envision completing the project within one to two years, while around one in five expect to finish in less than six months. A smaller share, about 17%, feel no rush and anticipate taking three years or more. These figures underscore how personal constraints—finances, land acquisition, labor availability, and design choices—can influence timelines, even among those who are most motivated to build.
Material choice also reveals preferences that shape the character of a country home. Wood emerges as the favorite among 42% of respondents, valued for its natural aesthetics and fast-building capabilities. Brick remains a close second, selected by 40% of participants for its durability and classic appearance. A notable minority, 11%, express interest in constructing with foam concrete or aerated concrete, materials known for lightness and good insulation properties. Together, these choices reflect a balance between traditional appeal and modern performance criteria in rural housing.
Budget awareness extends to maintenance costs as well. Roughly half of the respondents understand that keeping a country house to a comparable standard can be more expensive than maintaining an apartment. About 28% see little difference in ongoing costs between a suburban home and urban living, while 24% believe that apartment living is the more expensive option in the long run. These perspectives highlight the continuous tradeoffs homeowners anticipate, from heating and utilities to property upkeep and seasonal care.
Beyond the core questions about building and cost, the survey hints at broader concerns that influence the decision to pursue a countryside home. Prospective builders often weigh factors such as access to green spaces, proximity to essential services, land zoning and permitting processes, and the potential for future value growth. While the study centers on intentions, it also points to the practical steps required to turn a rural dwelling dream into a tangible residence, including securing land, selecting a reliable build team, and planning for sustainable materials and energy efficiency. As more families consider a mixed set of priorities—cost control, customization, and long-term security—the appeal of a self-built country house continues to rise as a viable lifestyle choice for many in Russia and neighboring regions.