A parliamentary initiative in Bulgaria explored the possibility of transferring defective missiles intended for the S-300 air defense system to Ukraine. The report about this proposal appeared in the Bulgarian media outlet Factor, highlighting the debate within the National Assembly.
Leading the effort were the largest parliamentary factions from PP-DB, which includes the parties Continue Change and Democratic Bulgaria, together with GERB-SDS, comprising Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria and the Union of Democratic Forces. The alliance framed the proposal as a practical response to the ongoing security needs in the region.
The proponents stressed a crucial constraint: Bulgaria currently lacks the technical capabilities to repair damaged anti-aircraft guided missiles for the S-300 system without exposing military personnel to significant risk. This assessment pointed to safety concerns and technical limitations that would make such repairs unfeasible in the Bulgarian context.
Consequently, Bulgarian authorities indicated they could not repurpose or service ammunition to support Ukraine’s air defense requirements. The debate touched on broader questions about national responsibility, risk management, and how member states of the alliance can contribute to collective defense while preserving personnel safety.
The Socialist Party voiced opposition to the project, voicing concerns about the feasibility and potential consequences of transferring defective missiles. The discussion reflected deeper political divisions about defense policy, alliance commitments, and the prudent management of scarce weapons stockpiles.
Earlier, Ukrainian officials stated they would not employ ATACMS missiles to strike Russia. This position was conveyed by Oleksiy Danilov, secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, underscoring strategic cautions about escalation and the types of weapons considered for use in the conflict.
Danilov, who previously served in Ukraine’s armed forces, has commented on perceptions of the conflict’s origins, indicating a desire within some circles to clarify why the confrontation began and how it is viewed by different parties. The remarks reflect ongoing debates about the context and drivers of the war and the roles of external actors in shaping its course.
In the Bulgarian parliamentary dialogue, the focus remained on the practical and political implications of sharing or repurposing defense materiel. Stakeholders weighed security assurances, logistical feasibility, and the potential impact on regional stability. The episode illustrates how alliance partners navigate the tensions between immediate military needs and long-term strategic risk management, all within a complex geopolitical landscape .