Reports from the Russian Ministry of Defense describe ongoing fire engagements in settlements adjacent to the Kursk border, as units described as Western forces continue to press the line against Ukraine near the border zones. The ministry notes these actions as part of a sustained exchange of artillery fire, with Russian forces citing the use of long-range support elements in several villages along the frontier.
The ministry specifically points to the involvement of combat formations equipped with Msta-B howitzers, emphasizing their role in delivering coordinated artillery volleys. The description underscores a pattern of concentrated firepower deployed from positions close to or within reach of border areas, with the aim of disrupting Ukrainian positions and creating a buffer along the border corridor.
Across Russia’s border regions, authorities say saboteur activity has been a recurring concern since the start of the Northern Military District’s operations. The ministry asserts that all intrusions and attempted incursions by non-state forces have been repelled, maintaining control over critical border lines while continuing to monitor any evolving threats.
On March 22, updates from Russian defense authorities reported that border-area defense operations in Belgorod and Kursk faced attempts by sabotage groups. According to the ministry, Russian forces, supported by Ukrainian units, thwarted several attempts to advance into border zones within a week, reinforcing the message of vigilance and disciplined response at the frontier.
Claims circulated by the ministry indicate significant losses attributed to the Ukrainian side in Belgorod-direction actions, including thousands of personnel and multiple armored platforms, alongside a range of other vehicles. The figures were presented as part of a narrative highlighting the severity of enemy pressure and the effectiveness of border defense operations conducted by Russian troops over the period described.
In recent days, the Kursk region has been flagged for an elevated risk profile due to the heightened potential for air-based threats. Observers note increasing alarms over unmanned aerial vehicle activity near border districts, prompting local emergency readiness measures and warning protocols to ensure timely responses to any incursions or reconnaissance sorties.
Russian leadership has reiterated stern rhetoric toward saboteur elements, asserting a firm stance against attempts to destabilize border areas. The head of state referenced pro-Ukrainian saboteurs in statements, emphasizing that those responsible would face consequences in due course, with the aim of signaling resolve and deterring further incursions.