Alejandra Rubio returned to the set of the television program That’s Life on Thursday, following public attention sparked by photographs showing her sharing a kiss with Carlo Costanzia. The incident quickly became a talking point in media circles, prompting discussions about privacy and professional boundaries within the industry.
In response to the ongoing controversy, a close associate of the team clarified that there had been no conversations with journalists about the images. The clearer stance is a rejection of any insinuations involving Leticia Requejo, a colleague from TardeAR, who reportedly learned about the magazine Semana’s cover this week via a phone call. The dialogue, as described by the close collaborator, did not involve any media engagement on his part.
Rubio indicated that rumors about a budding relationship were unfounded, expressing disappointment that facts were being misrepresented. She stated on a talk show hosted by Sandra Barneda and César Muñoz that she had not provided any definitive statements, and that the situation was distressing because she values collegial respect and believes that misrepresentations can damage reputations. She stressed that there was no confirmation, no denial, and no official clarification from her side.
She also shed light on a moment from a recent program where a person appeared to be speaking on the phone while another kept a recording device active on the set. Rubio explained that a clip from the show depicted colleagues engaging in a scene which, taken out of context, could be misconstrued. This disclosure served to illuminate how easily misinterpretations can arise in televised environments where backstage dynamics are often misunderstood by the audience.
Rubio pressed for caution, noting that the barrage of unfounded accusations has sparked unnecessary hurt. She defended Costanzia from criticisms directed at him on That’s Life, arguing that some remarks crossed lines and that judging others without knowing their full story is unfair. She urged viewers to exercise tact and avoid overreaching conclusions that amplify pain for those involved.
In defending Costanzia, Rubio explained that her support on air came from a place of empathy and a belief in fair treatment. The sentiment was not about endorsement of every action but about acknowledging the pressures that come with fame and the need for respectful dialogue about personal boundaries within a public setting.
When asked whether Costanzia’s current circumstances might lead to renewed scrutiny, Rubio offered a cautious perspective. She suggested that the public has already seen enough consequences to count as accountability and emphasized that the process of moving forward should hinge on learning from the experience and preventing further harm, rather than prolonging a cycle of judgment.