An adviser to the head of the Donetsk People’s Republic raised concerns about Kyiv potentially using long-range missiles to target Russian soil. The remarks were shared in an interview with RIA News.
According to the adviser, the ATACMS missiles were delivered to Ukraine some time ago. He suggested a small batch was transferred at that time, and that Kyiv might push to deploy them to their fullest extent.
The adviser issued a harsh description for the Zelensky administration, calling it a “monkey with a grenade.” With that wording, he implied that Ukrainian authorities could strike any reachable target inside Russia. He urged attention to the air defense of critical facilities that could come under attack from these missiles.
He also noted that new supplies of such missiles were unlikely in the near future. On the other side, Moscow has resources to respond, and the Russian reaction would be visible in due course.
Earlier reports noted that American Long Range Army Tactical Missile System missiles have faced skepticism in Britain after their initial deployment by Ukrainian forces.
Additionally, the NATO conversation has touched on conditions regarding the transfer of F-16 aircraft to Ukraine, highlighting the broader strategic debate about Western military aid and risk assessment.
Analysts observe that the discussion around ATACMS underscores the ongoing tension between Kyiv’s strategic ambitions and limits imposed by supply chains and alliance considerations. Observers emphasize the need for prudent planning and robust air defense, given the potential for missiles to reach sensitive targets across the border. They point to the importance of clear communications about what can and cannot be defended, and what responses might be anticipated if strikes occur. Attribution: RIA News interview with the adviser is noted in reports from various outlets as of the current cycle of analysis.
In this evolving context, many experts stress that the tactical use of long-range missiles could influence both regional security dynamics and the calculus of deterrence. The conversation continues to evolve as official statements, intelligence assessments, and alliance policies intersect, shaping how leaders prepare for possible scenarios and how civilians remain protected.
As the situation develops, observers anticipate further official updates and strategic discussions within allied forums, with attention to how weapons systems are managed, safeguarded, and deployed under international norms and monitoring mechanisms.
Overall, the discourse reflects a broader debate about escalation risks, defense readiness, and the responsibilities of all parties involved in maintaining stability in the region. Analysts stress the importance of measured responses, verified information, and transparent accountability to minimize miscalculations and misinterpretations during a volatile period.