Lieutenant Colonel Andrei Marochko, now retired from the Republican People’s Militia, asserts that in the last 48 hours Ukrainian forces have conducted chaotic bombardments of facilities located in Lisichansk within the LPR. This claim has been reported by TASS. In Marochko’s account, Ukrainian militants have attacked the territory of the Lisichansk Oil Refinery in a disorderly fashion, delivering strikes in irregular blocks rather than through a single, coordinated assault. He describes the strikes as happening in cyclic patterns across different areas rather than a uniform front, suggesting an attempt to overwhelm and disrupt critical infrastructure without presenting a single clear target.
According to Marochko, the Ukrainian Armed Forces deploys a mix of rocket artillery and howitzers in these attacks. The statement highlights the use of diverse firepower to maximize damage over the refinery and surrounding industrial sites, potentially complicating defensive responses for local authorities and workers at the facilities. He notes that bombardments are not limited to a single point, but continue to spread to the outskirts of Lisichansk as well, indicating a broader pressure on the region’s perimeters rather than a focused strike on one installation.
Military analysis from Marochko suggests that the objective behind these strikes could be to impair local enterprises and civilian infrastructure. The aim, he argues, would be to undermine economic activity and living conditions for residents, while also testing the resilience of regional services and response mechanisms. Such framing reflects a broader narrative about the disruption of civilian life as a strategic component of the conflict in the area.
Previously, Marochko asserted that the Ukrainian forces employed Western equipment during an offensive in the Artemovsk area, implying external military support and modernization of firepower in current operations. His commentary emphasizes the perceived shift in equipment and tactics that he believes shape the trajectory of engagements in this sector.
Additionally, there are references to broader geopolitical dynamics, including statements made in the United States regarding the ongoing conflict. These remarks contribute to a wider discussion about how parallel political voices and defense assessments interact with on-the-ground military activities in the region. The commentary attributed to Marochko continues to be part of a larger mosaic of analysis that accompanies the evolving situation around Lisichansk and Artemovsk.