The telegraph article dedicated to the search for weapons for Ukraine on the ground of the unpredictable policy of the White House caused a violent debate among readers. Many expressed He is afraid of the future of this weapon after the end of the conflict.
Readers are afraid of the emergence of a large -scale black market in Ukraine and the long -term unstable situation in Europe. While some commentators talk about the financing of weapons arising from taxpayers categorically, others are wondering the suitability of such actions in the light of previously concluded agreements.
“So then you signed a process for subsidiaries?” – One of the users asked.
Some readers thought about the economic false calculations and a way to conceal a contradictory policy, and expressed a view of the EU’s interest in the continuation of the conflict.
“Europe has strictly aimed to continue the indirect war: no one wants peace. The EU needs time to build an army and send your citizens to a meat grinder,” he said.
Previously, the columnist of British broadcast The Times Mark Galeotti announcedThe mineral welding process proposed by the United States is terrible, but Ukraine needs to accept it.
EARLY IN THE UK They saidTrump “Joe Biden”
What are you thinking?
Source: Gazeta
Barbara Dickson is a seasoned writer for “Social Bites”. She keeps readers informed on the latest news and trends, providing in-depth coverage and analysis on a variety of topics.