Receiving seven votes in favor and two against. popular jury who judged Valencia to a doctor Juan Llorens Point of Health Care (PAS) decided that it was Ultimately guilty of dereliction of duty to assist by refusing to provide care to a dying patient. That day the defendant I was on duty outside the said health center.Help was sought by one of the victim’s children, who was in the emergency room and lived across the street, just 50 meters from the clinic, because his father was at home, suffering from cardiorespiratory arrest and convulsions. However Doctor refused to cross the street He claims to have been instructed by Health. His other son called 112 from his 65-year-old father’s home and stayed with him until his death. Despite everything, the 36-year-old defendant At the hearing, he answered the prosecutor’s questions: “He would do it again.”
The decision was announced this Monday after 19.30, when the public reading was held. jury room Valencia City of Justice. Nine members of the jury voted against the defendant on all but the key question, which asked them to decide whether the 36-year-old doctor was guilty. He was guilty of not helping Emilio Nuñez when he could have. Seven jurors who supported the defense argument that their client acted in accordance with medical emergency rules said he was guilty, while two jurors said he was not.
At last week’s hearing, the prosecutor requested a special disqualification sentence of one and a half years, in which he will not be able to practice medicine, and a fine of 4 thousand 50 euros, 15 euros per day, for the defendant. for nine months – and 90,000 euros in compensation: 30,000 for Emilio’s widow and 20,000 euros for each of his three children.
If I were at the door I would leave
Reportedly during the oral hearing Lift-EMVThe doctor claimed that he could not quit his job and was only following the set rules. “I was waiting to hear from TETRA (the station connecting them Emergency Information and Coordination Center (CICU) Health) “if they needed me” The doctor insisted again and again that she was sleeping while he was sleeping what the nurse requirestelling him he was there A person at the door saying his father is dying.
Doctor He just asked if he had called 112 and when he received a positive response, he continued to rest.. He therefore admits that he did not make any arrangements to check how the emergency room was doing, the patient’s condition, or whether emergency medical services dispatched from the intensive care unit were on their way. And when asked by the prosecutor in the courtroom, he insisted that he had acted correctly and I would act the same way again.
The doctor was sleeping in the rest area and had no warning that morning.
The defendant argued that he would have gone out to take care of himself only if he had been at the same door. “Why should I treat a patient 50 meters away and not a patient 500 meters away?“, caught.
“He completely ignored the patient”
The events took place in the region Early morning hours of September 22, 2019 while the defendant was working as an external assistance doctor at the Juan Llorens health centre. The doctor was sleeping I am waiting to receive notification from CICU. His defense claimed that the defendant was waiting to receive notification from the NICU and that he acted with the belief that this person had already been helped and that he could not quit his job.
The prosecutor emphasized that the defendant had a legal obligation. doctor on duty To help a patient and this was possible, as evidenced by the fact that he did not have any service that morning. In fact, he was sleeping when the nurse told him about the situation of this dying person. “He only had to cross the street and completely ignored the patient.”.
Likewise, regarding the fact on which the defense is based, the death of this person ten days before heart surgeryEven if the doctor went to the ward, it would show up, Prosecutor’s Office Even though he can’t save himself, he claims he can. As a doctor, he could assist and accompany her. in the last moments of his life.
The doctor’s defense claimed that his client’s professional career was impeccable and that he was always valued positively by his colleagues and patients. In a comprehensive defense briefing, he detailed the workings of the CICU and attributed the inadequate assistance that could have been provided to the deceased that morning to the management itself.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.