Defense of the CM, the driver of the bus that crashed in Cerdedo-Cotobade last Christmas Eve R.rejects the conclusions of the expert report The report, prepared by Civil Guard technicians and announced last Thursday by Pedro Blanco, the Government delegate in Galicia, points to excessive speed as the cause of the accident in which seven people died.
Sources consulted by Europa Press from the motoring community expressed their disbelief in concluding that the departure from the road was due to excessive speed. they are not supported by calculations What is reflected in the document held by Pontevedra court number 1, which is responsible for investigating the case.
They claim that the cause of the accident was: meteorological conditions The incident, which prevailed in the region on the night of December 24, 2022, with heavy rain and low visibility, caused the bus to ‘aquaplane’ in the puddle at the bend before the entrance, according to the driver’s defense. The Pedre bridge, where he fell from a height of 29 meters until he fell into the bed of the Lérez river.
This was stated in the first statement given by the driver himself at the Civil Guard headquarters on December 30, six days after the accident. His defense suggests that they will pursue this version, which will be supported by: Two expert reports that will refute Benemérita’s conclusions of factThere is “no data” reflecting the “formula” by which the bus is calculated to go faster than 80 kilometers per hour (the limit at that point).
Preservation of evidence
The driver’s lawyer suspects that the bus’ tachograph, which was pulled from the water after the accident, was declared “useless”. He also focuses on the chain of custody of the evidence, as he understands that the vehicle should not have been transported to Monbus company facilities in Pontevedra. because this is the party dealing with the case as the owner of the line.
At the company’s garage in Lourizán, Civil Security technicians inspected the vehicle to obtain information for their report on the causes of the accident.
The condition of the bus is another argument used in the defense of the driver, who, according to these sources, noticed that the vehicle had “problems” in the days before the accident.
The defense thus expresses its “frontal” opposition to the conclusions of the Civil Guard report, which it sees as “directed” only to hold the driver responsible, “ignoring” issues such as the condition of the bus or the weather conditions that night. .
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.