TSJC does not see it as sexist to impose a breast-level advertisement on employees.

High Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) Do not mind sexist a company to impose on its employees a uniform with a chest-high advertisement, as long as it is also mandatory for male workers. This was determined by a decision by the judges that lifted the €25,000 fine imposed by a court of first instance, which EL PERIODICO from the Prensa Ibérica group had access to and which found this commercial practice discriminatory for women. The Supreme Court was of the opinion that the commercial campaign in question was no more objectifying for women than for men.

The facts date back to January 2019, when the fuel company delivered a new workwear to its employees, consisting of a printed T-shirt from forced use and a new commercial campaign. This advert it was located just in line with the workers’ chests (or their counterparts’ pectorals) and contained the phrase: “Ask me for the most advanced fuel on the market.” A few of the employees expressed their feelings. discomfortbecause as a result some customers were staring at their breasts.

The CCOO union sued the company after it refused to withdraw the uniforms in question or offer an alternative to employees who were offended by them. The uniform in question had not previously been agreed with the legal representatives of the workers. initially court magistrate 32 social de Barcelona agreed with the union and described the practice as sexist. But on the company’s appeal, TSJC decided otherwise and ruled in Galp’s favour, as it felt the ad campaign did not “sexualize” women.

“moral judgment”

The judges defend their decision that they did not find out. direct discrimination because of gender, shirts were the same for men as for women. An example of direct discrimination based on gender is that female cabin crew must wear a different uniform – with heels, make-up, and mascara – than male crew members, as recently determined by the Work Inspection at Vueling.

And a second argument is that they didn’t see anything. indirect discrimination for gender reasons. That is, although officially the same treatment for men and women is the same, it is actually different. Something that the president of the first instance court appreciated.

Although women’s breasts were often a sexualized part of the body, she thought it was discriminatory for them to place advertisements at this height. Often times a heterosexual man can use advertisements to look at his breasts.

Here, the TSJC judges amend the verdict as follows: “The inscription on the chest area of ​​the shirts constitutes a sexual claim on the worker, not on the worker,” an idea that clearly contradicts morality and the condemnation of the female body, the equality of men and women”.

In other words, the TSJC affirms that it is a moral judgment and a violation of the principle of equality for a woman’s breasts to be more ‘sexualizable’ than a man’s, regardless of the fact that historically women’s breasts have been the object of sexualization more often than men’s. . Therefore, Galp decides in favor of the company and removes the 25,000 Euro fine.

Source: Informacion


More from author

Biden asked Republicans to support the border bill 06:47

US President Joe Biden requested Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives to support a bill to secure the Mexican border. ...

“The degree of unpredictability has increased.” Russian billionaires are returning their assets to Russia Bloomberg: Rich Russians are returning their assets to the...

Wealthy Russians have begun returning assets to their homeland in response to the growing threat of seizures, the agency reported. BloombergHe is talking about...

DPR collects evidence of war crimes in Kiev 06:41

Authorities of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) have been collecting evidence of war crimes committed by Ukrainian authorities and security forces in Donbas since...

The dentist explains which toothbrush is better to choose: soft or hard 07:00

The real question when buying a toothbrush is: Which one should you choose - hard or soft bristle? On the Internet it is...