Argentine Vice President Cristina Fernández Kirchner reiterated his criticism of María Eugenia Capuchetti, the judge in charge of the investigation into the assassination attempt. At the beginning of September, under the influence of politics and described it as “unsustainable” continuity of the trial judge.
“In this video In 4 minutes and 4 seconds, you will learn of the new and very serious irregularities of not investigating Judge Capuchetti.“, the vice president wrote in a message to his profile on the social network Twitter.
This tweet is accompanied by a video detailing the litigation process in which Fernández Kirchner highlights the objection. filed this Monday against the rejected judge.
The video, as quoted by journalist Julia Mengolini, shows that the objection presented this Monday is based on the fact that: “The investigation started badly”.
“A few hours after the attack and while Capuchetti was in custody, the contents of the cell phone of the killer (Fernando) Sabag Montiel, who had triggered the gun 15 centimeters from Cristina’s face, were destroyed and deleted,” the audio-visual document reads.
Also, “for days, judge delays arrest of two of his accomplices: Brenda Uliarte and Nicolás Carrizo” He continues, “Added to this is the paralysis of the case as soon as evidence emerges linking opposition leaders to the attack.”
Also, Kirchner He regretted that Capuchetti did not investigate his deputy Gerardo Milman for warning of a “false attack”. Against Cristina “to victimize her, to free her from the legal threads she was in” and to “request a report on the detention operation of the vice president and her family”.
Likewise, the vice president recalled that “During the Mauricio Macri Government and prior to his appointment, Capuchetti regularly visited the Federal Intelligence Service (AFI).
Added to this was doubt. the magistrate would receive instructions on how to deal with the case through the media and possible lines of inquiryAs condemned by ‘number two’ of the Argentine Government.
On Monday, a federal judge dismissed the vice president’s appeal, alleging that the attacker had committed “at least negligent” acts since “the first day of the investigation” when his phone was reset.
The magistrate argued that the condemned “alleged bias” was not appropriate in the decision. “some correlations with objective data”unprovable “possible presence of fear of bias”He collects the Argentine newspaper ‘La Voz’.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.