When the word Saw is spoken, images flash across the mind: a brutal massacre, a detective thriller with a tangled plot, or a jarring blend of both. Once again, Saw unfolds as a psychological drama centered on the cancer-stricken John Kramer. How far can a franchise push a subject so heavy and controversial? The answer remains elusive, leaving audiences to decide what success means for the series.
I want to play a game with you. Yes, I’m tired of it. I’m going on vacation!
Saw 10 explores friendship, hope, and mutual aid while still carrying the hallmark of a bloody spectacle. The film introduces a version of Kramer who appears capable of genuine care for others and even of sparing the innocent. Yet the motive remains unsettling for fans of the franchise. In these moments, the antagonist faces his own fragility as he battles cancer, reaching for a sliver of survival. The film makes a curious choice to show moments of kindness from a character who is known for death machines, inviting viewers to reassess what counts as redemption in a broken system.
Kramer’s fight against illness often dominates the frame, giving the impression of a solo show at the outset. The story’s long arc gradually reveals its main players, including the villain who embodies a familiar cinematic trope—a clear and memorable antagonist drawn with the blunt strokes of 1990s action cinema.
Which film among the top three do you think is the best?
The pacing stays tight for only a few moments, with two twists nudging the plot into momentum. The first twist appears in the official summaries across streaming and review platforms—audiences aren’t required to guess. It lands with a reverent nod to the classics. Most of the film, however, struggles to sustain emotional engagement or invest in the characters because the chemistry isn’t there. The antagonist follows a straightforward rule of bad deeds, and many supporting figures fade quickly from memory.
Kramer remains a focal point in the operation room—an image of control and danger—while the surrounding cast sometimes feels underwritten.
Traps. Bad toastmaster — and the competitions are boring
Yes, Saw is still about traps. The set pieces include a handful of symbolic devices and one notably unusual moment, but the villain rarely leverages them in surprising ways. The familiar toolkit—gas, toxins, explosives, severed limbs, and dissection—lines up with expectations. The standout trap appears early on, and the accompanying visuals are not without their striking moments.
I want to be just like ‘that’ movie!
The latest entry speaks to fans of the original trilogy by echoing its texture. It revisits the heartfelt speeches and moral reflections of John Kramer, attempts a dramatic reveal with high-impact plot turns, brings back Amanda, and reintroduces the infamous “pig” assistant—the most interesting character for some. The film recreates certain sequences from the first movie to evoke nostalgia, a reminder of those eerie moments that defined the series. For anyone who misses the creepy doll cruising on a bike, recollections of old favorites surface here as well.
Yet the new installment rarely lives up to the legacy. The nostalgic cues compete with weaker character development and a slower overall pace. The film leans on fanservice to prop up the legacy of the first three chapters, but the result feels more like homage than a fresh achievement. If a true moment of originality exists, it’s overshadowed by a desire to evoke familiar emotions and again pose moral questions about justice. Attempts to explore internal conflict and the weight of fate come across as muddled rather than revelatory. In the end, the film comes across as a partial return rather than a reinvention of the franchise.
Saw 10 occupies a difficult niche. It can be a casual gathering pick, a light way to reconnect with friends over a “trash movie” night, but it shouldn’t be treated as a weekend crown jewel. It amounts to a weaker entry that relies on memory rather than innovation, appealing mainly to long-time fans who crave the familiar beats of James Wan’s early work.
What would viewers like to see more of in Saw?
Source: VG Times