Beyond Good and Evil 2 has lingered in the public eye since its first reveal in 2008, with long stretches of silence that left fans unsure of its fate. A re-announcement in 2017 brought renewed attention, yet the project has repeatedly appeared to drift through development unease. Recently, reports surfaced about significant changes at the main studio behind the game, Ubisoft Montpellier, where head Guillaume Carmona was reported to be leaving the company after years at the helm, without an officially disclosed reason beyond standard confidentiality.
According to industry outlet Kotaku, Carmona had already been absent from the studio since early in the year and will not be returning. This development marks a notable leadership shift within the studio that has long overseen the Beyond Good and Evil franchise’s ambitious ambitions. Carmona’s deep tenure with Ubisoft reflects a veteran executive who helped steer several large projects through years of shifting priorities and creative challenges.
The broader status of Beyond Good and Evil 2 remains a topic of discussion among observers. A prominent insider claimed last year that the project has not been canceled, but the path to release is anticipated to be lengthy. The absence of a concrete pre-production phase has continued to stall formal planning and early-stage development work, suggesting the team is still aligning conceptual goals with technical feasibility.
Further changes have touched the project’s creative leadership. Reports indicate that senior creative director Jean-Marc Geffroy and game director Benjamin Dumaz have departed, with Emile Morel and Charles Gaudron expected to step into the leading roles to carry forward the vision. In such large, long-running projects, leadership transitions can signal a shift in creative direction or a strategic pause while teams reassess scope, milestones, and target platforms.
What this means for fans and the industry at large is a reminder of how sprawling AAA projects can behave like marathons rather than sprints. Even with strong brand recognition and a loyal fan base, the development cycle can stretch over many years, involving reorganizations, recalibrations of story and gameplay systems, and the constant negotiation between ambition and practical constraints. It is also a case study in how studios manage internal talent shifts, external expectations, and the complex logistics of coordinating cross-game initiatives under a single umbrella brand.
While official details remain scarce, observers note that Ubisoft has continued to spare no effort in maintaining continuity for the Beyond Good and Evil universe. The studio’s approach appears to be balancing a high fantasy, expansive world with the realities of modern game production, including evolving engine choices, procedural content systems, and the demands of today’s multiplayer and online components. In the end, the cadence of updates, the cadence of hires and exits, and the pacing of public communications will shape how the project is perceived in the months ahead.
As with many long-delay projects, patience becomes a practical expectation for fans, analysts, and retailers alike. The story surrounding Beyond Good and Evil 2 highlights the delicate interplay between creative aspiration and organizational feasibility. It underscores how the industry treats long-awaited titles that promise to redefine a franchise while navigating the inevitable turbulence that accompanies large, visionary endeavors.
Sources referenced in trade reporting include industry outlets that track developer movements and project status updates, providing context for the ongoing evolution of the studio lineup and the Beyond Good and Evil 2 initiative. These insights help frame the current moment within Ubisoft’s broader creative portfolio and its commitment to delivering a cohesive and compelling experience for players on multiple platforms, even as timelines remain fluid.