The editor of the publication Passion was contacted by a man who, by March 8, offered his services to a single woman for millions of rubles. The approach was blunt: a proposal to become a personal poet, with a daily stream of poetry promised for a full year in exchange for 15 million rubles. The offer came with bonuses as well, including the rights to his writings and a specially signed book. The publication notes that the author intended to use the proceeds for charity and to address housing needs. This paints a picture of a market where romantic fantasies are monetized and where even creative acts like poetry are positioned as transactional goods, especially aimed at lonely or vulnerable individuals. It serves as a cautionary glimpse into the darker side of online dating ads that mix affection requests with financial exploitation.
In its review of similar advertisements found on a major Russian advertising site, Passion discovered that there are still men willing to market services to single women while they are on vacation. One man, Nikita, offered to go on a quiet date for 30 thousand rubles on March 8, promising to sit beside a woman in a calm, unobtrusive way. He also pitched additional perks, such as a massage for 50 thousand rubles or a free iPhone for 15 thousand rubles, though the cost of the smartphone itself would be borne by the buyer. The pricing structure itself signals a transactional dynamic where gifts and experiences are priced separately, and the buyer is expected to cover the tangible items. The broader implication is a marketplace that blends social interaction with explicit monetization, sometimes blurring boundaries between companionship and commercial exchange.
A different offer, presented by a man named Fatih, suggested meeting in his car for 300 thousand rubles or, alternatively, the chance to “create an exemplary family and raise smart children” at a bargain price. He also proposed a more intimate option—being allowed to cry beside him—for 50 thousand rubles. These propositions reveal a troubling pattern where deeply personal experiences and emotional moments are commodified, turning intimate support into a priced service. The ads reinforce how fragile moments and aspirational family ideals can be exploited in purely financial terms, turning private vulnerability into a business transaction.
In a related note, the piece recalls that the former ballerina Anastasia Volochkova once spoke about March 8 in a way that suggested the day was not universally celebrated or valued in the same way by everyone involved in the scene. The juxtaposition underscores how public personas and private interactions intersect in media coverage of social exchange, where cultural expectations around romance and gift-giving can be misused or misinterpreted in online ads. While these stories highlight odd and unsettling facets of contemporary dating culture, they also illustrate why discernment matters when navigating offers that mix affection with money and material incentives. At the same time, readers are reminded to approach such ads with critical thinking and to consider safety and consent as paramount considerations in any real-world engagement.