Journalist Ksenia Sobchak showed support for the singer Glukoza, who found herself at the center of contention when producer Maxim Fadeev moved to strip her stage pseudonym following a controversial Krasnoyarsk performance. Sobchak shared her perspective on a Telegram channel, emphasizing that the decision on discussing private matters should rest with the artist herself and noting she has long understood the underlying dynamics but still respects personal boundaries. Her stance also placed Sobchak in opposition to Fadeev, who has publicly argued that Glukoza has misused sensitive moments tied to her family and personal life for attention or gain.
The situation stems from public remarks about Glukoza by Fadeev, who maintains that the singer is deeply affected by the loss of her grandmother Lydia and that her public behavior could be interpreted as a strategic move rather than a misstep. The controversy intensified as Fadeev warned that he might pursue legal action to revoke the artistic pseudonym through court processes, claiming a breach of professional and ethical boundaries in the conduct attributed to Glukoza on stage.
On July 20, a concert by Glukoza in Krasnoyarsk drew substantial media attention as eyewitness accounts from various outlets described a performance that appeared to fall short of expectations. Reports from local journalists indicated that the artist seemed to struggle with hitting notes and displayed moments of extended pauses that led to speculation about stage comfort and personal strain during the show. Such accounts have fed the ongoing dialogue about how personal challenges intersect with public performances in the music industry.
Following the concert, Fadeev publicized his view that Glukoza had crossed several boundaries with that appearance, signaling an intent to pursue legal measures to challenge the use of the stage name in the future. This potential legal step would involve formal proceedings aimed at protecting artistic identity and brand continuity within the music scene, a move that underscores the strong emphasis placed on naming rights and professional identity in entertainment circles.
In the wake of the incident, Natalya Ionova offered her first public commentary on the matter. Ionova suggested that the artist’s unusual behavior on stage could be linked to the use of antidepressants and sleeping pills, pointing to health-related stress as a contributing factor. Ionova noted the emotional weight of Glukoza losing her grandmother Lydia, a figure who had played a significant role in her upbringing, and framed the broader dispute as one that reflects longstanding friction between Glukoza and her former producer Maxim Fadeev. The narrative depicts how personal sorrow and career pressures can collide in the public eye, shaping both perception and career trajectories for artists in ways that extend beyond a single performance.
Earlier developments included public comments from Galustian, who had previously reached out to Glukoza in the wake of the Krasnoyarsk scandal. The exchange highlighted the ecosystem of support, disagreement, and negotiation that often surrounds high-profile performers when reputational stakes are high. This sequence of events illustrates how relationships in the music industry can oscillate between collaboration and conflict, affecting decisions about branding, stage presence, and public messaging for artists navigating intense scrutiny.