In Krasnoyarsk a tense moment around the pop scene drew attention when producer Maxim Fadeev weighed in on a controversial performance by the singer Glukoza. The incident sparked a cascade of discussions online and in local media as observers debated the rhythm, stage presence, and overall execution of the act.
Fadeev conveyed that Natalya Ionova, the artist known publicly as Glukoza, crossed a line during the Krasnoyarsk show. He signaled the intention to pursue legal measures to sever Ionova from the artistic alias and to prevent the continued use of the Glukoza name in connection with his own body of work and songwriting. The goal, according to Fadeev, is to protect the integrity of the project he authored and to ensure that his creations are not misattributed or misrepresented by a performer who has already diverged from the original collaboration.
Speaking with a sense of urgency, Fadeev stated that his team would build a case that would strip Ionova of both the alias and the right to perform his material under that pseudonym. He described the recent events as a troubling disruption and suggested that a legal strategy would address what he called a form of reckless behavior. The producer emphasized that the chaos stemming from the Krasnoyarsk episode demanded a firm, lawful response to restore order and accountability within the music community.
Initially, Fadeev had cautioned that the controversy could also reflect poorly on his own reputation due to his connection with the Gluck’oZa project as the writer and driving creative force. However, he later clarified that he did not intend to bar Ionova from using a stage name entirely. Instead, the emphasis remained on separating Ionova from the Glukoza persona and ensuring that any future performances under a similar brand would be clearly delineated from his original contributions.
As the situation unfolded, the Krasnoyarsk audience experienced a moment of dissonance during what was billed as Metallurgist Day. Eyewitness reports collected by local media indicated that Glucose appeared to struggle with the live notes and, according to some observers, engaged in actions that distracted from the performance. The incident prompted immediate commentary across social platforms and in entertainment press, with many fans and critics weighing in on the artist’s stagecraft and professionalism on the night in question.
Earlier, residents of Krasnoyarsk and attendees at the venue engaged in a broader discussion about the performer’s conduct on stage. The conversations ranged from questions about vocal technique and stage awareness to concerns about onstage behavior and its impact on the show’s atmosphere. The unfolding dialogue reflected a community actively evaluating how public performances translate into lasting impressions and how artists navigate pressure, expectations, and the responsibilities that come with large audiences and media scrutiny. In this atmosphere, many voices urged a measured response that would protect the integrity of the performance space while respecting the rights of the artists involved, as the debate continued to evolve around what happened and why. [Attribution: local media and eyewitness accounts]