Spain’s Eurovision journey continued with a moment of triumph and reflection. After securing third place in the 2022 final and the warm reception in Madrid at the Plaza Mayor, the Spanish representative answered a call where YOTELE was present, underscoring the strong connection between the artist and the national audience.
In the grand finale held last Saturday, the mood was bright as the event reached its peak. Chanel lit up the stage with a performance that earned third place in the musical competition. The show took place at the PalaOlympico in Italy, and the entry accumulated 459 points for the arrangement of slow motion. This achievement marks a new milestone for Spain, surpassing the previous record set in 1973 when the song Eres tú earned 125 points. The moment resonated across the country as fans celebrated a notable chapter in Spain’s Eurovision history.
During those three minutes on stage, Chanel delivered one of her most compelling passes since arriving in the Italian city. The arena filled with the presence of spectators for the final, and the performance showcased a remarkable blend of dance and vocal strength. The artist demonstrated versatility and confidence, moving seamlessly between choreography and melody, leaving a lasting impression on the audience and juries alike.
The finals also carried a decisive note about the voting process. A statement issued on the night of the breakdown revealed that the European Broadcasting Union revisited the juries’ scores and recalculated the results of six nations after identifying irregular voting patterns. This adjustment prompted a new assessment of the final rankings as the process unfolded under scrutiny.
The affected countries were Azerbaijan, Georgia, San Marino, Poland, Montenegro, and Romania. The recalibration appeared to reflect voting alignments among these nations, a factor that occasionally surfaces in large multi-country contests. The adjustment prompted discussions about fairness and transparency in the scoring system and how bloc voting can influence a contest of this scale.
Romania’s national broadcaster TVR publicly addressed the matter, expressing surprise that the Romanian jury’s vote might not have been fully integrated into the final tally. In a formal statement, TVR called for clarification from the EBU and signaled readiness to take further steps if needed. The broadcaster noted a point distribution detail indicating Moldova would receive 12 points rather than Ukraine, while Spain would gain three points instead of one.
The entire episode underscored the complexity of large-scale voting events where national selections intersect with international results. It highlighted how rules, procedures, and timing can influence final standings and the importance of transparent communications from organizers. For fans and participants, these moments bring additional layers of drama to a competition that blends music, performance, and national pride. The ongoing dialogue around voting integrity remains a salient topic for future editions, prompting discussions on best practices, safeguards, and the overall credibility of the Eurovision experience.