There has been discussion in the Duma about establishing a state-backed agency tasked with handling the sale of pirated film copies. The proposal came from Artem Kiryanov, a deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Economic Policy. He argued that such an agency would collect content without royalties and without violating the intellectual property rights of other nations, creating a centralized channel for distribution to colleagues who would use the material for work purposes.
Kiryanov has emphasized that the idea should be implemented as a deliberate policy rather than a casual, ad hoc venture. He suggested that a centrally controlled body could amass available content in a way that removes private market uncertainty, with the understanding that the content would be used by professionals within the state framework. The approach would, in his view, ensure orderly access to material while avoiding unauthorized sharing or unpredictable infringement actions.
According to Kiryanov, the aim is to prevent any perception among Russian citizens that they are being denied access to needed services or resources. He proposed that a state-centered solution could provide a reliable pipeline for content consumption, potentially supported by revenue generated through the viewing of such material by state channels or designated institutions. The overall objective, as stated by the deputy, is to balance accessibility with a clear, centralized governance model that aligns with broader economic and policy goals.
During the discussion, Kiryanov noted that import substitution might play a role in this framework, but he stressed that any such material would still be procured through centralized mechanisms overseen by the state. The proposal reflects a broader conversation about how to manage cross-border content in a way that preserves national interests while addressing the practical needs of policymakers and public institutions.
As this topic continues to unfold, observers are watching how the plan would interact with Russia’s existing stance on intellectual property and digital content. Questions remain about how a state-organized distribution model would function in practice, how royalties and compensation would be addressed for content creators, and what oversight would look like for government-managed archives. Analysts point out that the proposal could, if adopted, set a precedent for how other sectors handle licensed or restricted media in an era of rapid digital distribution. The conversation also touches on the potential implications for international diplomacy and industry relationships, given the sensitive nature of copyright and market access in a global media landscape.
Source: VG Times