A court in Spain has asked for La Fábrica de la Tele, the production company behind Sálvame, and its former director to face trial on accusations of revealing secrets. The case also names police officer Ángel Jesús Fernández Hita and photographer Gustavo González. Court documents show that the officer may have accessed personal information about dozens of celebrities by querying restricted police databases, a move that raises urgent questions about privacy and how sensitive data is managed in a glare-filled media environment where public figures are constantly under scrutiny. For audiences in Canada and the United States, the situation underscores why privacy protections and data handling rules matter to media companies that operate across borders and across languages. The allegations suggest a pattern of activity aimed at turning information into leverage within a competitive entertainment news cycle, fueling interest from lawyers, regulators, and newsroom leaders who watch this case closely.
Investigations indicate Fernández Hita supplied these data to González over a period spanning from 2009 to 2017, during which the Internal Affairs unit uncovered the matter. The court notes that exchanges, whether via WhatsApp or in person, involved the delivery of at least 182 documents, including statements and police files, some containing information about minors and cases of abuse. All of these exchanges were framed as acts of personal enrichment, and the court describes the conduct as a clear sale of sensitive information for profit. This period coincides with intense media attention and the desire to feed exclusive stories, a dynamic that places privacy issues at the center of public debate about how journalists access and use sensitive material in pursuit of scoops. Observers in North America may see echoes of privacy debates in their own legal frameworks, reminding media organizations to balance public interest with the rights of individuals.
<!–>]
The magistrate argues that the leadership of the program was the driving force behind seeking private and intimate information that should have remained protected. As a result, the court proposes that La Fábrica de la Tele assume direct civil liability and that Mediaset España, owner of Telecinco, bear civil subsidiarity. This arrangement would mean the media group could be responsible for indemnities if the production company and the accused fail to satisfy the court’s orders for compensation. In practice, such an arrangement would push accountability up the chain and set a precedent for other producers who handle sensitive data in the context of celebrity reporting. For North American and Canadian readers, the outcome could influence how broadcasters collaborate with production houses to manage data privacy risk and how civil liability is allocated when staff or partners cross lines.
In practical terms, the charges have ten days to file written pleadings, shaping the penalties prosecutors seek as the case advances in a media landscape. The former heads of La Fábrica de la Tele, Óscar Cornejo and Adrián Madrid, now lead Fabricantes Studio, a production company behind Ni que fuéramos. Reports suggest the firm is negotiating with a national broadcaster to create an afternoon magazine for La 1, indicating that even as legal proceedings unfold, programming strategies and new business deals continue to evolve in a way that shapes the TV production scene. Observers watching this story note how the cross-border visibility of the case may affect decisions by content creators, advertisers, and regulators across North America and beyond, highlighting a broader shift toward greater scrutiny of data privacy in entertainment media.