Showman Nikita Dzhigurda has drawn a cautious line regarding the father of his children amid the spread of a video involving ballerina Anastasia Volochkova. He refrained from condemning him as the scandal continues to unfold, a stance reported by HABER.RU. In describing his heirs, Dzhigurda suggested they are distinct and more mature, noting that they seem detached from the concerns of the generation that came before. According to his account, after the video circulated online, his children simply acknowledged it with a casual, “Yes, I heard it, dad, it’s beautiful.” In this assessment, the entertainer claimed his offspring did not align themselves with Volochkova’s circle, a view echoed by his wife, Marina Anisina. The couple’s statements collectively reinforce a family perspective that appears to distance the younger generation from the public drama surrounding their mother figure.
The events trace back to a January 14 encounter captured on video, where Volochkova and Dzhigurda were seen performing a dance to a song by Lyubov Uspenskaya, titled “Guitar.” The footage depicts a moment of kneeling and a rapid removal of Volochkova’s trousers, followed by a firm press to the dancer’s abdomen and a grab to the chest. Such actions have sparked questions about boundaries in public performances and the boundaries of consent, with observers urging a measured response from all involved.
Earlier reports indicate that Dzhigurda indicated his intent to push for a criminal case against Evgeny Ilyin, the driver who released the controversial video featuring Volochkova. The ballerina is also pursuing legal action against StarHit and Anastasia Ananina, as well as the editor-in-chief of the NeMalakhov Telegram channel, under charges related to the breach of confidentiality. These legal moves underscore ongoing tensions and highlight the fragile intersection between private lives and public exposure within the entertainment sphere.
In a separate note, Dzhigurda suggested that deputies should turn their attention toward Prigozhin, signaling a broader political or public interest stance that intersects with the personal spotlight surrounding these figures. The remarks imply a larger dialogue about accountability, media scrutiny, and how high-profile figures navigate personal disputes when sensitive material becomes public.