A controversial report claims that ballerina Anastasia Volochkova faced a 40,000 ruble charge for defecating under a Christmas tree on her own property. The story originated from a Telegram channel known as NeMalakhov and has circulated online with various details and interpretations. The claim centers on a unique incident tied to her private residence, and it has sparked discussions about personal boundaries and property rights. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
Online footage connected to the case appeared as part of a special procedure, and Volochkova has publicly engaged in the dispute by accusing a former member of the Strelki group, as well as a neighbor named Ekaterina Lyubomskaya, of leaking materials related to personnel matters. In response to the accusations, Volochkova filed a lawsuit. A judge ultimately ruled in favor of the former Strelok participant, a decision that influenced subsequent legal and personal exchanges between the parties involved. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
Following the court ruling, Lyubomskaya reportedly reimbursed herself for her legal fees, a development that contributed to ongoing tensions in the case and among circles connected to the dancing and entertainment community. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
Earlier, Volochkova had been entangled in a public disagreement with actor Nikita Dzhigurda. Reports indicate that Dzhigurda stated he had ceased communication with Volochkova in the prior year, highlighting a pattern of public disagreements that have followed the ballerina through different episodes. He cited the exchange of harsh words as a turning point in their relationship. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
In January, a video surfaced online showing a performance where the former prima ballerina danced with Dzhigurda to a song by Uspenskaya titled “Guitar.” During the dance, the scene included moments of controversy, including a moment where Volochkova was kneeling and gestures were interpreted by some viewers as provocative. Dzhigurda publicly claimed that the provocation had been staged in advance and indicated he would not consider Volochkova a friend going forward. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
Volochkova responded by asserting that the provocation had been premeditated and reaffirmed that she would not rely on a friendship with Dzhigurda again. The exchange underscored ongoing enrollment of personal disputes into the public sphere, where media coverage and social channels amplify differing narratives. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
In reflecting on these episodes, observers note how personal rivalries and public disputes intersect with celebrity status, media channels, and legal frameworks. While each party presents their side, the broader conversation centers on how private conflicts become public discourse, how allegations influence reputations, and how legal proceedings shape subsequent interactions within artistic communities. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)
Throughout these developments, the participants have navigated a web of accusations, counterclaims, and media commentary. The evolving story illustrates the challenges that public figures face when personal life intersects with professional visibility, and how social platforms can rapidly shape perceptions, regardless of the outcome of formal proceedings. (attribution: NeMalakhov Telegram channel)