A high-profile party organized by Nastya Ivleeva drew attention for its bold dress code and provocative theme. Singer Lolita Milyavskaya weighed in on the event, publicly expressing appreciation for the night while criticizing the concept of nudity as a form of satire rather than overt exposure.
Milyavskaya described the evening as elegant and tasteful. She explained that the aim was not to celebrate nudity itself but to present an ironic and artful stance toward body visibility. Attendees were asked to dress in outfits that suggested the human form without revealing it. According to the singer, the result was a playful, lighthearted atmosphere where the clothing choices were made in good humor, and many guests appeared with a certain angelic charm rather than anything sensational.
The December gathering hosted Ivleeva as the host, inviting a lineup of well-known figures from music and fashion. Participants included Philip Kirkorov, the pop singer; Glucose, a fellow musician; and television personality Ksenia Sobchak. Among the guests was rapper Nikolai Vasiliev, who performed under the stage name Vacio and reportedly wore a minimal accessory as part of the dress code. Ivleeva stood by her party concept, stating she would not apologize for the styling choices she encouraged.
The guest list also featured rapper Dzhigan and his partner Oksana Samoilova. Samoilova chose a practical yet stylish look, favoring a one-piece overalls pairing with a jacket, while Dzhigan wore tracksuit-inspired attire. As the night progressed, Samoilova removed a hoodie to reveal a more confident, post‑weight‑loss silhouette, drawing attention to personal transformation and body positivity in a celebratory setting.
Earlier, Ivleeva had already sparked discussion by hosting a similar event that showcased a sparkling, diamond-adorned thong as part of a naked-at-play aesthetic. Commentators noted the recurring theme of clothing that hints at nudity in a humorous, non-explicit way, steering the conversation toward style as performance and social commentary rather than mere provocation. Observers described the trend as a blend of fashion satire and celebrity spectacle, with the emphasis on mood, humor, and artistic expression rather than sensationalism.
Analysts and fans alike discussed how such parties reflect wider conversations about celebrity culture, body image, and the freedom of self-expression in public events. Critics argued that the concept pushes boundaries and invites dialogue about how clothing can function as commentary, while supporters praised the event for its creative risk-taking and for encouraging participants to approach nudity as a cultural artifact rather than a spectacle. Lively debates emerged about the balance between performance art and personal boundaries, especially in a media landscape that often scrutinizes every outfit choice by public figures. Overall, the event was framed as a stylish, controversial, and conversation-starting moment within contemporary pop culture, inviting reflection on how dress codes shape perception and identity in the social scene.
Cited observers point to Ivleeva’s role as a curator of provocative experiences that blend entertainment with fashion discourse. Reported reactions from attendees suggested a mix of amusement, surprise, and appreciation for the boldness of the concept. The night served as a reminder that fashion can be a form of storytelling, where garments act as characters and the wearer as a narrator. While opinions diverged on the boundaries of such expressions, the consensus highlighted the party as a notable moment in the ongoing evolution of celebrity-driven fashion statements. The event continues to be referenced in discussions about creative dress codes and the intersections of humor, art, and public persona.