Russian Veterans activists call on Valery Meladze to sell Spanish villa and fund the Northern Military District
Activists from the Russian Veterans movement urged singer Valery Meladze to consider selling his villa in Spain and donating the proceeds to support the needs of the Northern Military District. The appeal was reported by the outlet Puree.
In their appeal, the activists invited Meladze to join humanitarian missions within the special operations zone. Ildar Rezyapov, head of Veterans of Russia, asserted that such a move could allow the artist to demonstrate resilience and focus on the well-being of volunteers, military personnel, and units within the Northern Military District by directing funds from his overseas property toward relief efforts. The message framed the donation as a tangible way for the artist to contribute to the protection and support of servicemen and veterans who operate in the region.
On July 10, Meladze spoke with Mash, a Telegram channel, stating that he planned to return to Russia. The remarks came amid ongoing public attention surrounding the artist and his activities overseas, including a period in which he was criticized for perceived ties to the conflict in Ukraine.
Mash reported that Meladze also distanced himself from supporting the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The reports referenced a video from a Dubai concert where the singer was accused of giving a salute associated with Ukrainian supporters and the phrase “Glory to Ukraine! Glory to the heroes!” Meladze reportedly explained to his family that the footage had been manipulated by provocateurs who sought to misrepresent his position.
Producer Iosif Prigozhin offered support for Meladze, noting that a favorable return to Russia could lead to large stadium performances once permission to work domestically is granted. Prigozhin highlighted the singer’s potential to fill major venues, emphasizing that his ability to perform in Russia would be a strong signal of his re-engagement with the domestic market.
Earlier comments from Prigozhin suggested that Meladze has a lobbying presence within Russia, underscoring the complex network of interests surrounding the artist. The unfolding situation reflects broader tensions as public figures balance international visibility with domestic expectations and affiliations.
The discussions around Meladze illustrate how cultural figures can become focal points in broader geopolitical conversations. They also raise questions about how philanthropy and international real estate holdings intersect with national service obligations and public perception. Supporters argue that charitable actions, when directed toward defense or relief initiatives, can complement the work of humanitarian organizations and military units deployed in sensitive regions. Critics, meanwhile, caution against perceived manipulation of public sentiment or the use of celebrity status to influence political outcomes.
Observers emphasize the importance of transparent channels for donations and clear communication about how funds would be allocated and administered. In regions facing logistical and security challenges, the impact of philanthropic contributions can be significant, but it requires careful oversight to ensure accountability and measurable results.
Valery Meladze’s case continues to unfold as he navigates questions about his public stance, his financial assets abroad, and his willingness to engage with humanitarian work in conflict-affected zones. The evolving narrative underscores how individual artists can become part of larger conversations about regional security, cultural diplomacy, and the responsibilities that come with fame in a highly interconnected world.
As the public and media follow every development, the key issues remain clear: whether Meladze will convert his international assets into direct support for the Northern Military District, how his personal decisions align with his stated positions, and what impact his actions might have on his career in Russia and beyond. The dialogue continues to reflect broader debates about charity, patriotism, and the role of cultural figures in times of national strain. The situation is being monitored by supporters and critics alike, with each side weighing in on the potential outcomes and the lasting implications for Meladze and the communities involved. The conversations are ongoing and reflect the colored spectrum of public opinion that surrounds prominent performers in today’s global information environment.