During a recent meeting with producer Joseph Prigozhin HABER.ru spoke with his colleague Valery Meladze about the singer’s strong wish to return to Russia. The conversation highlighted the emotional weight behind such a decision and the impact it has on those close to the artist.
Prigozhin explained that Meladze envisions large-scale stadium projects if he is allowed to work in Russia again. He stressed that judging people who long for home is unfair, and that everyone deserves a fair chance to pursue their craft. As Valeria’s husband, Prigozhin underscored a belief shared by many in the artist’s circle: opportunity should be accessible to those who plan to contribute to the cultural landscape of the country they consider home.
“The key is staying grounded, avoiding pitfalls, and not letting oneself become a victim of unscrupulous individuals. We are not without fault, and many people find themselves caught up in this broader issue,” Prigozhin remarked. His comments reflected a nuanced view of the situation, acknowledging human imperfection while emphasizing resilience and integrity.
What resonates with Prigozhin is Meladze’s spiritual approach to his art and the way his work resonates within Russian society. He noted that Meladze has spent his career building a presence in Russia, cultivating connections with audiences and collaborators that extend across generations. The producer’s perspective centers on the artist’s long-standing commitment to the region and the cultural significance of his contributions.
“He’s a Georgian by birth who grew up in Ukraine, and now the question is how to move forward. I am not here to judge anyone. If he travels to Russia and is granted the right to return, there will be no obstacle to his doing so. I don’t know what his plans are, but it’s clear that in Russia there is warmth and anticipation for him,” Prigozhin stated.
On July 10, Meladze indicated in a talk with the Mash Telegram channel that he intends to come back to Russia. The artist emphasized a desire to reconnect with the country and with fans who have followed his career for years. This public declaration followed a history of philanthropy and support for peers in the industry, illustrating a pattern of generosity that accompanies his artistic journey.
Prior to these discussions, Meladze had already demonstrated a spirit of giving by contributing funds toward medical treatment for Otar Kushanashvili. That act underscored a broader sense of solidarity within the cultural community and a willingness to mobilize resources when colleagues face difficult times. The sequence of events paints a portrait of an artist who navigates personal longing, public expectations, and a network of collaborators who advocate for his return.
The evolving situation raises questions about how artists who have spent formative years abroad might reintegrate into the Russian cultural scene. Meladze’s case highlights the delicate balance between personal identity, career aspirations, and the responsibilities that come with influence. Support from peers like Prigozhin can play a meaningful role in shaping the public narrative, offering reassurance to fans and stakeholders while preserving the artist’s autonomy.
Observers note that a successful return would depend on multiple factors, including regulatory permissions, visa considerations, and the practicalities of reestablishing a touring schedule. Yet the underlying sentiment is one of welcome and anticipation. In a country where Meladze is admired for his contributions to music and for the emotional depth of his performances, the prospect of future projects has sparked curiosity about potential collaborations, live performances, and the artistic direction he might pursue next.
As discussions continue, those involved emphasize the importance of ensuring a fair process that respects the artist’s rights and desires. The broader takeaway is a reminder that art crosses borders and that the cultural dialogue benefits when talent is allowed to flourish in the environment where it feels most at home. The conversation around Meladze’s return is less about urgency and more about thoughtful consideration, consequences, and the lasting value of artistic expression to both individuals and communities.