On October 1, a scheduled round of mediation will connect star surgeon Timur Khaidarov with his patients and the participating clinics, following the mutual agreement of all sides. This update comes from a spokesperson for the victims, Elena Senina, speaking to kp.ru, and signals a concerted effort to resolve disputes through dialogue rather than litigation.
The mediation process is intended to steer the matter toward a voluntary, cooperative settlement without proceeding to court. If all parties maintain good faith, the talks could lay the groundwork for a constructive, behind-the-scenes agreement that addresses concerns raised by patients while preserving the integrity of the clinics involved.
Senina confirmed that the first mediation session has been scheduled for Sunday, October 1, at noon, with participants from GMTClinic, Olympus Clinic, IQ Plastique, and Khaidarov’s own practice expected to attend. Representatives from the clinics and the surgeon’s team are coordinating travel arrangements for patients who have voiced complaints. They will travel from various regions of the country, take time off work, and incur travel costs to participate in what is described as a face-to-face opportunity to negotiate directly. The Senina team emphasized their readiness to engage in good-faith discussions and to explore all avenues that could lead to a fair resolution for those affected.
On September 26, Elena Senina announced that the mediator process had received formal authorization to proceed. The document authorizing mediation was signed by the general directors of Olimp Clinic, GM Clinic, IQ Plastic, and the surgeon Timur Khaidarov, underscoring a broad, multi-clinic backing for the negotiations and the commitment of leadership to a peaceful settlement.
The backdrop to these negotiations includes a public dispute dating back to July, when pop singer Slava alleged that Khaidarov performed a breast augmentation that did not meet expectations. She reported asymmetry and visible scarring, prompting widespread concern among patients. In response, Khaidarov said the singer did not follow post-operative scar care recommendations, a claim that has sparked further discussion among patients and professionals alike. Since then, more than fifty additional individuals have joined a formal collective letter, expressing concerns about outcomes associated with the surgeon’s procedures.
Looking ahead, the question remains why Khaidarov agreed to enter mediation. He has publicly stated that engaging in dialogue can help clarify misunderstandings, establish shared expectations, and minimize the risks and costs associated with lengthy disputes. Supporters of the mediation approach argue that it offers a measured path to resolution, allowing all parties to present their perspectives in a controlled setting while maintaining the option to pursue formal remedies if negotiations reach an impasse. The parties involved appear to be aiming for a transparent process that protects patient welfare and upholds professional standards, even as tensions persist in the broader conversation about outcomes and care quality.