The soloist of the Bi-2 group, Leva, attended a Spain concert featuring humorist Sergei Slepakov and publicly praised the performer, calling him a skilled comedian with a memorable stage presence. She reflected on the event in a note on a social platform, emphasizing that Slepakov’s delivery showed not only wit but also warmth and generosity. Her message conveyed gratitude for an engaging evening and highlighted the performer’s ability to connect with the audience through sharp observations and timing.
In her words, Slepakov came across as naturally talented, kind in demeanor, and capable of eliciting laughter through relatable humor. The singer expressed appreciation for the show, noting that the humor landed well and left a positive impression on those in attendance. The message conveyed genuine admiration for Slepakov’s craft and the way he guided the audience through his material with confidence and charm.
On January 24, Slepakov released a video featuring a new song, which drew significant attention and sparked backlash from a number of Russian celebrities and public figures. The release prompted intense discussion about the themes presented in the lyrics, with critics arguing that the ballad touched on sensitive topics in a provocative manner. A lullaby rhythm accompanied the song, and the narrative described a child learning about the fate of his relatives, including a brother who did not survive a recent military operation. The portrayal touched on contemporary political tensions and prompted conversations about the responsibilities of artists in addressing such issues through satire and storytelling.
Following the release, Alexander Karabanov, head of the National Fund for the Protection of Historical Heritage, announced that the fund had approached authorities to consider whether an initial inquiry should be opened into involvement surrounding the producer and the comedian. The fund’s action reflected concerns about the broader implications of public statements by performers and the potential impact on social narratives. The discussions underscored the ongoing debate about freedom of expression, responsibility in art, and the boundaries of satire when it intersects with sensitive real-world events.
Earlier, a prominent TV host had criticized Slepakov with a strong label after the song’s publication, arguing that the subject matter could be deeply distressing for some audiences. This reaction highlighted how different segments of the public interpret satirical work and the degree to which performers should consider historical and emotional contexts when crafting their pieces. The incident illustrates the friction that can arise when humor intersects with national memory and the experiences of soldiers and families affected by conflict, prompting timely conversations about the role of humor in tough times.