Singer Grigory Leps recently sparked conversation by sharing that he underwent a procedure he described as a form of cosmetic surgery. The claim appeared in a report by mk.ru, prompting readers to consider the singer’s approach to privacy and media storytelling.
In his remarks, Leps indicated that the procedure involved his genitals. It remained unclear whether the statement was made in earnest or as a facetious remark, leaving room for interpretation by his audience and media outlets alike.
He described a notable side effect of the treatment, noting that a dog associated with the anecdote had become smaller in appearance. The comment drew a mix of reactions and added a peculiar twist to the discussion surrounding the singer’s personal life.
Beyond the cosmetic topic, Leps emphasized a philosophy about wealth and possession. He stated that money is not his primary focus and that he chooses to live a rather private, almost secluded life. The singer mentioned owning expensive items, yet he stressed that he treats them with calm detachment. He even said that he would not be upset if his living situation were more modest, illustrating a preference for simplicity over material display.
On the family front, Leps’ personal life has seen changes in recent years. He separated from his wife, Anna Shaplykova, in 2021 after a two-decade marriage. The couple shares three children: daughters Eva and Nicole, and a son named Ivan. Leps also has a daughter, Inga Leps, from an earlier marriage. Despite the separation, the artist maintained cordial relations with Anna, highlighting a cooperative approach to co-parenting.
During a concert in Kostroma on April 13, an incident occurred in which Leps accidentally knocked a fan’s phone from their hand after the fan tried to capture a moment. When another attendee urged him to stop filming, the singer continued recording, an action that drew subsequent discussion among fans and critics alike. The exchange added fuel to ongoing conversations about the boundaries between performers and their audiences.
Earlier, Leps had addressed a related incident involving a fan who used obscene language, offering his perspective on the confrontation and the dynamics of public performances. The episode remained part of a broader dialogue about behavior, accountability, and the pressures of live celebrity life. [Source attribution: mk.ru]