A Russian singer known as Mister Credo, whose real name is Alexander Makhonin, could not attend a festival in Kazakhstan because he was prohibited from leaving Russia due to outstanding debts. The situation was reported by Life, citing unnamed sources close to the case. The media note that Makhonin is currently in a position where travel abroad is prevented by financial claims tied to tax authorities and related penalties. Life emphasizes that the issue centers on a substantial debt to the Federal Tax Service and a separate charge tied to traffic violations, complicating any plans for public performances abroad.
The debt details show that the Federal Tax Service is pursuing a total of 300,000 rubles from Makhonin, with an additional 40,000 rubles outstanding for traffic violations. In the eyes of the organizers of the retro festival in Kazakhstan, this financial strain translates into a breach of contract, as the singer had been paid in advance for a July 14 appearance that he was unable to fulfill. The proxy reporting highlights that the festival organizers have since initiated discussions about remedies for the non-performance connected to the commitment previously agreed upon with the artist.
According to information circulated on Telegram, Makhonin attempted to cross into Kazakhstan via Belarus after border guards at Moscow’s airport refused his release. It was reported that his passport had expired, preventing him from crossing the border. The channel notes that authorities did not permit entry at Belarus, leaving the traveler in limbo and underscoring how travel bans tied to debt obligations can intersect with international travel rules and permit regimes.
In a separate development, attention has shifted to a high-profile figure in the Russian media landscape as bailiffs reportedly began pursuing blogger Anastasia Ivleeva over tax obligations. The Federal Bailiff Service has reportedly opened enforcement proceedings for tax debts that exceed 11.3 million rubles. The broader coverage indicates a pattern of enforcement actions against prominent public figures who owe the Federal Tax Service money, highlighting the state’s active efforts to recover unpaid taxes from high-visibility individuals. Ivleeva’s case has been framed in reports as part of a wider crackdown on tax compliance among celebrities and influencers.
Earlier updates suggested that Ivleeva’s total tax debt might have reached 20.9 million rubles, with banking authorities reportedly notifying financial institutions to suspend activity on her accounts. These moves illustrate how debt recovery measures can impact accounts and financial operations, even for figures with a significant public profile. The ongoing proceedings reflect the broader mechanics of tax collection in the country, including steps to safeguard assets and ensure compliance across different sectors of the economy and public life.
In another note, Grishaeva has been referenced in prior discussions as having described a humble origin for one of her first earnings, claiming that she bought a small doll with her initial wage of three rubles. The retelling of this anecdote appears in the surrounding narrative, underscoring how early earnings narratives often circulate in media coverage about artists and public figures, contributing to a broader image of their personal history and the emotional arc of their careers.