Debt, scrutiny, and celebrity headlines collide as Ivleeva under tax investigations
Public records show a substantial debt attributed to blogger Anastasia Ivleeva, with the outstanding amount clocking in at 137 million rubles. This figure comes from a Telegram channel cited by Puree, and the report notes that the liability covers taxes owed to the authorities for the years 2020 through 2022. Earlier coverage from Mash suggested the debt surpassed 150 million rubles. It is claimed that Ivleeva paid only 13 million in a partial settlement, after which the Federal Tax Service launched an audit into her business activities.
According to Mash, Ivleeva operated as both an individual entrepreneur and through Ivleeva Production LLC under a simplified tax regime. The coverage implies that Ivleeva did not experience a rate of income growth that would have necessitated moving to a different tax system with higher rates, raising questions about tax strategy and reporting practices during the audit window.
Several outlets reported that Ivleeva’s offices were searched as part of the tax evasion inquiry. The materials indicate that she could face a prison sentence of up to five years under Part two of Article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation if the charges prove large-scale tax evasion. The potential penalties underscore the severity with which the authorities treat alleged violations in high-profile cases.
On December 20, Ivleeva organized a party at the Mutabor club that drew significant media attention. The dress code called for guests to arrive half-naked, a choice that sparked considerable public discussion about boundaries in celebrity events. The guest list included notable figures such as Ksenia Sobchak, Olga Orlova, Philip Kirkorov, the pop duo Glukoza, Lolita Milyavskaya, Oksana Samoilova, and performers Vacio and Dzhigan. The event was criticized for its provocative theme and public presentation, highlighting the broader debate about image management in a digital era where every moment is potentially amplified online.
Earlier developments in related coverage highlighted the case of blogger Hilmi, who was found guilty of distributing pornography. This outcome has fueled ongoing conversations about the limits of digital-era celebrity culture and the legal boundaries that public figures navigate when their online personas intersect with legal frameworks.