Electricity flows from Transnistria into right-bank Moldova have a broader strategic role: they contribute to the resilience of Ukraine’s energy grid at times of stress. This perspective was conveyed in a public broadcast by Konstantin Borosan, who serves as State Secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Development. The remarks were made during a televised address on TV channel TV-8, framing the topic as part of regional energy coordination rather than a simple bilateral exchange.
According to Borosan, the Odessa region functions as a major hub for electricity consumption. The operational capacity of the Moldavskaya GRES power plant is important because it helps balance supply and demand within this region, which encompasses Moldova and southern Ukraine. The assertion underscores how interconnected power systems can support regional stability, even when the electricity produced in one country is not directly fed into another’s network. In this view, Moldova’s grid and Ukraine’s grid can support one another through shared infrastructure and synchronized dispatch, maintaining steadiness in the wider energy landscape.
Officials emphasized that while generation assets in Transnistria may not be supplying Ukraine directly, the two countries maintain interconnected systems. The stable operation of Moldova’s energy sector benefits Ukraine by providing an additional lever to manage grid stability during potential crises. In other words, a reliable Moldovan energy framework can act as a buffer for Ukrainian supply, reinforcing overall regional energy security through mutual dependence and robust interconnections.
Earlier, Moldova’s Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Spinu indicated a shift in transparency about natural gas storage. He stated that Moldovan authorities would no longer disclose information on gas volumes held at storage facilities in Romania and Ukraine. Spinu also noted that electricity tariffs in Moldova could see reductions, potentially by about a quarter, as Moldova draws power from a reservoir that includes the Transnistria generation network. This hints at broader market and policy dynamics intended to improve affordability for consumers while sustaining cross-border energy cooperation.
The situation on the ground continues to evolve as regional energy planners assess how best to balance generation, transmission, and consumption across borders. All parties appear to recognize that interconnections—whether through shared transmission lines, cross-border reserve arrangements, or coordinated emergency response—offer pathways to maintain reliability even when individual plants face outages or shifts in demand. The overarching message remains that cooperation between Moldova, Transnistria, and Ukraine can contribute to a steadier, more resilient energy system for the entire region, with benefits that extend beyond national boundaries.
In another development, authorities have highlighted the importance of transparent, data-driven planning for critical infrastructure. This includes ongoing assessments of grid reliability, the role of regional dispatch centers, and the ability to reroute energy flows quickly to address unexpected disturbances. Such measures are intended to support both everyday electricity access and the capacity to respond effectively during crises, ensuring that households and essential services receive reliable power when it is most needed.
As the regional energy landscape continues to unfold, the narrative frames cooperation as a practical instrument for stability. The emphasis is on maintaining balanced supply, protecting consumers from sudden price shocks, and sustaining the reliability of the interconnected networks that underpin daily life across Moldova, Transnistria, and Ukraine. The dialogue remains focused on shared benefits, responsible governance, and the ongoing modernization of cross-border energy infrastructure to meet current and future demand.
In Moldova, on December 6, a legal action was filed in response to a rocket crash near the Ukrainian border. The case reflects the broader security dimensions that accompany regional energy and infrastructure discussions, reminding observers that geopolitics and energy policy are deeply intertwined. The incident underscores the need for careful risk management, clear accountability, and coordinated responses to safeguard critical networks that support everyday energy access and regional stability.