In Rostov-on-Don, local residents reported a peculiar moment when a portrait of the city’s head was placed inside a hole in the road. The patchwork repair that followed only added to the oddity of the scene, and the episode quickly circulated on the Telegram channel Rise. The event sparked conversations about urban upkeep, speed of repairs, and the ways citizens engage with city governance in real time.
Witnesses say that the pit near 2nd Five-Year Plan Square had already drawn complaints from pedestrians and drivers. In response, someone set up a chair bearing a photo of Alexey Logvinenko atop the pit near the collector, turning the spot into a makeshift memorial and a focal point for public discourse. Cement then filled the area, a new warehouse was positioned there, and the portrait became a viral symbol online. People debated whether officials treated the image as a substitute for an official cover, while others joked that more faces might be printed to cover more holes around the city.
Official statements asserted that municipal authorities closed the hole, but questions linger about whether the mayor’s image influenced the pace of work or simply drew attention to the issue. The episode illustrates how residents use humor and visible acts to highlight infrastructure problems and to accelerate accountability from officials.
In a separate incident in Vladivostok, reports described a road collapse on Chernyakhovsky Street. The municipal administration said an investigation was launched, and a video captured the moment a fence toppled, followed by a section of asphalt and a nearby lamppost sliding toward the slope. A residential building stood roughly ten meters away as caution tape surrounded the damaged area, underscoring the potential dangers of aging city infrastructure and the need for timely repairs.
Earlier coverage noted another incident in Khimki, where police reportedly detained a local resident suspected of damaging more than 25 car tires, a reminder that road and street-related events often intersect with public safety concerns and neighborhood tensions. The pattern across these stories reflects a broader conversation about maintenance, governance, and citizen participation in urban life.