The evolving stance on used spare parts within mandatory traffic insurance

No time to read?
Get a summary

The proposal to amend the mandatory traffic insurance law, which would permit the use of used spare parts in vehicle repairs covered by insurance, remains unclear. Reports from TASS, citing Ivan Chebeskov, head of the fiscal policy department at the Ministry of Finance, note the ongoing questions surrounding this topic.

The issue is not simple, Chebeskov said. On one side, there is recognition that obtaining new spare parts has become more difficult. On the other side, there is concern about whether using secondhand components can be guaranteed to prevent a car from breaking down or leading to another accident. This tension highlights the challenge of balancing accessibility and safety in the repair process.

Chebeskov indicated that a workable mechanism for certifying used spare parts has not yet been established. Without a clear certification framework, assessing the quality and reliability of these parts remains a major obstacle for policymakers and industry stakeholders alike.

The plan to allow used automobile parts in repairs within the scope of compulsory automobile insurance was discussed as a possible shift in the regulatory landscape. It was proposed to extend the typical repair window from thirty days to forty-five days, acknowledging that delays often occur when insurers struggle to obtain parts within the previously set timeframe. In particular, the initial rollout would focus on parts such as fenders, bumpers, and hoods, which generally do not affect safety safety-critical systems but are frequently damaged in accidents. The intention is to reduce repair bottlenecks and provide a practical path for vehicle restoration when fresh components are scarce.

The legislative process involved a transfer to chamber consideration for the first reading of the bill. The measure would enable vehicle owners to request a cancellation of vehicle registration at the traffic police after a sale, with the exact date still to be determined. The procedural step underscores the broader implications of the policy, including how it could influence ownership transfers, insurance claims, and compliance with registration rules across the country.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Hércules targets a strong rebound after season-opening loss

Next Article

Rewrite of Marina d’Or Acquisition News: Strategic Investment and Future Tourism Vision