The Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs has expressed clear opposition to penalties tied to the practice of monitoring average speeds and time-based restrictions shown on information boards and road signs. This stance was articulated by Irina Volk, the ministry’s official spokesperson, via the ministry’s Telegram channel. She emphasized that drivers should not be held liable merely for average speed calculations or for complying with displayed time restrictions on information boards.
The discussion about tightening traffic rules includes a draft decision from the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation. Published on the official portal for regulatory acts in draft form, the proposal seeks to expand the role of dynamic information boards and variable information signs. Under this plan, drivers could face fines for infractions of the speed limit that is displayed on those boards along the Moscow Ring Road and other major highways. These restrictions often come into play in adverse weather conditions, when traffic management systems aim to guide motorists more effectively and safely.
Industry observers noted last week that the daily business newspaper Kommersant, citing the draft amendments finalized by the Ministry of Transport, reported that penalties might apply again to motorists who exceed the average speed on road sections monitored by security cameras. The timing and scope of these potential penalties are tied to the ongoing discussion about how best to enforce speed limits and general traffic discipline using automated monitoring and dynamic signage.
Earlier in the week, traffic police clarified the schedule for a planned enforcement campaign in the Moscow region, highlighting that the authorities have been detailing dates for upcoming checks and patrols. The evolving policy landscape reflects a broader public safety objective—balancing road efficiency with protective measures for drivers in varying conditions, while also addressing the operational realities of automated speed enforcement in a dynamic traffic environment. The dialogue shows a government intent to refine how information is presented to drivers and how penalties might be applied within a modern digital signage framework, rather than relying solely on fixed limits and static signs. The overall aim appears to be reinforcing adherence to speed restrictions while acknowledging the practicalities of weather-related driving challenges and the role of technology in traffic management.