A video from the scene of the SUV explosion appeared on the Moscow prosecutor’s Telegram channel, showing a stretch of Profsoyuznaya Street where emergency teams and investigators moved in the aftermath. The clip confirmed that the Tank 300 SUV bore the main impact of the blast and that a nearby Mazda was caught in the disruption. Residents reported the sudden tremor, the smell of smoke, and the wailing of sirens as responders worked to secure the area. Officials began sharing updates from the scene as the investigation progressed, with authorities indicating that work at the site would continue and that every detail would be checked before presenting final findings. The footage provided a visual record for the public while investigators began collecting evidence and mapping damage across the vicinity, all while keeping a careful eye on safety and access control at the site.
The authorities stated that work at the scene would carry on as investigators gather physical evidence and document the layout of the area. The messaging from the channel suggested that the criminal case remained under formal oversight, signaling a structured investigation process. At the site, police and forensic teams established a perimeter to protect evidence, while technicians catalogued debris, confirmed vehicle positions, and outlined the blast footprint. Officials emphasized that the response remained active through the early hours and would extend as the probe unfolds. No conclusions about suspects or motives were drawn at that stage, and officials stressed the importance of verifying every detail before releasing new information.
From the released footage, damage extended beyond the Tank 300. A nearby Mazda also suffered through the blast, with the right front door glass shattered and a tire deflated. Debris lined the pavement, and responders moved between vehicles to ensure safety, assess spill risks, and prepare for more thorough inspections. The scene underscored the broad reach of the blast and the need for careful documentation to understand how the incident unfolded and who might be responsible.
The incident occurred on October 15, southwest of Moscow. Preliminary data indicated an improvised explosive device detonated between the hood and windshield of a Chinese-made Tank SUV on Profsoyuznaya Street. Investigators began reviewing footage and witness accounts to determine the device’s placement and timing, recognizing the complexity of an urban setting with ongoing traffic and pedestrians. The blast site became a focal point for emergency responders and law enforcement as they worked to secure the corridor and preserve evidence for the ongoing inquiry.
The explosive device was placed on the driver’s side, explaining why the occupants and nearby people were at risk. In the initial phase, three people were injured, including a six-year-old child and two adult men. Medical teams treated those on site and transported them to hospitals for further care, while authorities urged the public to avoid the area to facilitate a thorough investigation and minimize additional danger.
The child sustained serious injuries in the event and was taken to a hospital for urgent care. The driver appeared to have a possible broken arm, and another victim suffered shrapnel injuries in the thigh. The medical brief highlighted the severity of the incident and the need for sustained monitoring of all victims as doctors assess long-term outcomes and potential complications. Investigators coordinated with medical facilities to ensure comprehensive records were kept for the case.
Later findings indicated the blast stemmed from a homemade mine, exploding on the hood of a businessman’s car. The description pointed to a deliberate or opportunistic attack using a home-crafted device, with investigators pursuing leads related to procurement, construction, and possible links to surrounding security concerns. As the probe continued, authorities planned to examine security footage, vehicle histories, and eyewitness statements to build a coherent timeline and identify responsible parties.
Three days earlier, on October 12, in the Leningrad region, gas cylinders exploded inside a car during repairs, reportedly due to safety violations. The welder, who was also in the vehicle with the car owner’s wife, did not survive the blast. Images circulating online showed a car consumed by fire, with the rear portion of the roof torn away by the flames. The incident served as a stark reminder of the dangers associated with improper maintenance and the need for strict adherence to safety protocols in workshop environments.
Earlier in the Moscow region, authorities reported a major accident involving five vehicles, adding to a string of urgent responses in the area. The event highlighted the pace at which urban incidents can escalate and the importance of rapid clearance, accurate reporting, and coordinated action among emergency services, investigators, and local authorities to restore safety and begin the formal inquiry into cause and accountability.