Marketing firm NAPI recently evaluated the cost of traveling a set route using five popular Chinese-brand crossovers. The study found that among these models, the Haval Jolion recorded the lowest travel expense for a 70-kilometer trip on roads within the Moscow region. It led the pack ahead of the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro, Geely Coolray, Changan CS75, and the Moskvich 3. The takeaway is not just about sticker price; it reflects how much a vehicle consumes fuel, how efficient its drivetrain is, and the ongoing ownership costs that accumulate over a route of this length. In other words, the Jolion offers a favorable balance of fuel economy and maintenance predictability for long drives in this area, according to NAPI’s findings. (NAPI)
More specifically, NAPI estimates that a Balashikha to Odintsovo trip, conducted in a Haval Jolion in the Comfort configuration, will cost about 1.3 thousand rubles when excluding the driver’s salary. The same journey in a Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is estimated at 1.4 thousand rubles, while the Moskvich 3 equipped with a CVT is projected at around 1.5 thousand rubles. The Changan CS75 comes in at roughly 1.66 thousand rubles for the same route. These figures are derived from a comprehensive approach that factors in fuel consumption, the five-year cost of vehicle ownership, and typical maintenance needs over that period, providing a clearer picture of real-world expenses for mid-range crossovers. (NAPI)
It is important to note that these calculations attempt to mirror typical usage patterns rather than a single, exact trip. They reflect the interplay between engine efficiency, tire resistance, weight, and average driving conditions across the Moscow region. Shifts in fuel prices, changes in insurance premiums, and routine maintenance costs can all influence the final tally. Nevertheless, the results offer a practical benchmark for those considering long drives or regular commuting within this corridor. By comparing several models side by side, drivers can make more informed choices about which crossover aligns best with their travel needs and budget, particularly when the decision involves planned routes with frequent use. (NAPI)
Beyond the immediate travel cost, these assessments also touch on broader ownership considerations. For instance, fuel economy and maintenance intervals tend to be more favorable on certain configurations than others, which can translate into meaningful savings over a typical five-year horizon. The Jolion’s affordability on a per-trip basis, coupled with its expected reliability and lower operating costs, might make it a compelling option for households that regularly travel between suburbs around Moscow. On the other hand, model choices like the CS75 or Tiggo 7 Pro may offer advantages in cargo space, comfort, or drivetrain stability that appeal to different drivers, even if the per-trip expense appears slightly higher. (NAPI)
When planning trips of this kind, drivers often weigh several factors: initial purchase price, insurance costs, depreciation, fuel efficiency, and maintenance expenses. The NAPI analysis provides a structured way to quantify these considerations on a per-trip basis, enabling consumers to forecast budgets more accurately. It also highlights how small differences in fuel economy and drivetrain efficiency can accumulate into noticeable savings or costs over time. For families and professionals who rely on dependable daily transport, such insights can influence long-term decisions about which crossover to buy and how to allocate spending for the road ahead. (NAPI)