The Bashkortostan Prosecutor’s Office has forwarded an indictment in the criminal case involving Ildus Shaibakov, the former head of the interregional registration and inspection division within the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate of the Republic, together with seven of his subordinates. This development is confirmed by reports cited by Kommersant and the press service of Bashkortostan’s prosecutor, underscoring a widening probe into alleged criminal activity linked to the regional traffic police leadership and their staff.
According to the charges, the participants formed a criminal group, accepted bribes, and abused official duties. The case is slated for review by the Ufa Ordzhonikidze District Court, where prosecutors are expected to present evidence detailing the alleged scheme, the roles of each participant, and the impact on public trust in the traffic safety system within the region.
The inquiry traces back to August 2021, when investigators from Ufa’s State Traffic Inspectorate reported the existence of a criminal association among its personnel. A criminal case was opened against seven former traffic police officers in Bashkortostan, including Shaibakov — identified by media as the former chief of the Bashkir MREO traffic police department and referred to as the “golden traffic cop.” He was reported to be in custody during that period, highlighting the seriousness with which authorities treated the alleged misconduct.
Over the ensuing two years, prosecutors extended the investigation to determine whether additional participants were involved in fraud. The group is being treated as an organized crime unit, with Shaibakov positioned at the helm. The defendants also include aides Aidar Gindullin, Ildar Gubaidullin, Evgeny Evseev, Ilshat Zagidullin, Ildar Nafikov, Mikhail Pasitov, and Dinar Fakhretdinov. Investigators contend that the defendants illegally re-registered fleets of vehicles and sold off rights connected to these assets, effectively draining value from the department’s resources and potentially distorting the allocation of duties within the inspectorate.
The broader context surrounding the case includes earlier reporting on the legal stance toward traffic violations and signals. Previous coverage noted that the Supreme Court had accepted fines proposed for drivers who run yellow signals as part of the legal framework in force at the time, a detail that situates the ongoing proceedings within the wider discourse on traffic law enforcement and penalties in the region.
As the legal process moves forward, officials from the Bashkortostan prosecutor’s office and coverage by Kommersant continue to frame the case as a significant test of accountability within state institutions entrusted with public safety. The indictment and its forthcoming courtroom examination are expected to clarify the scope of the alleged scheme, the exact nature of interconnected actions among the defendants, and the procedural steps required to determine any further involvement among other potential participants linked to the enterprise. The case underscores ongoing efforts to reinforce integrity and transparency within the traffic safety sector, particularly in relation to vehicle fleet management and the handling of related rights and privileges.
In summarizing the evolving narrative, authorities are pursuing a precise accounting of the alleged activities, the roles of the various named individuals, and the overall operation that prosecutors view as an organized crime activity. The proceedings are being watched closely as they may set precedents for how future investigations are conducted within Bashkortostan’s traffic enforcement apparatus, including how similar allegations are addressed and resolved in a manner that upholds the rule of law and public confidence. This synthesis reflects official statements from the Bashkortostan prosecutor’s office and coverage from Kommersant, with attribution to the respective reporting entities.